Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turlock woman fired for Obama racial slur on Facebook

Posted on 11/09/2012 8:12:23 AM PST by modernline2009

Edited on 11/09/2012 8:21:15 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

TURLOCK-- A Turlock woman has been fired and reported to the Secret Service for her President Barack Obama racial slur and assassination comment on Facebook.

The Modesto Bee (http://bit.ly/TPtRc5) says 22-year-old Denise Helms of Turlock posted the inflammatory comments on the social media site shortly after the president's re-election on Tuesday.

She used the n-word in referring to Obama and wrote that maybe he will be assassinated this term.

Excerpt, read more at MercuryNews


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: bho44; deaththreats; facebook; fb; fired; nword; obamaassassination; slur; usss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: firebasecody

And WON, too!


21 posted on 11/09/2012 8:44:57 AM PST by firebasecody (Orthodoxy, proclaiming the Truth since AD 33)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009
She should have put her comments in a rap song and everything would have been cool.
22 posted on 11/09/2012 8:47:15 AM PST by Niteranger68 (When you play all-or-nothing, be prepared to get nothing...maybe even less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

I am sure that will be required soon like in North Korea. I am sure those who talk smack about Obama may not necessarily be arrested but I am sure will be watch at places like their job if they don’t lose their job. Scary times we live in now.

> Now that we are a Third World wannabe..we all need to have a picture of the El-Presisdent and the First Lady in our business and living room. And no darts allowed.


23 posted on 11/09/2012 8:48:04 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009
Get rid of Facebook- those goons are squarely in Obamas
corner. Gee I wonder what else these technology brats could do with computers.
24 posted on 11/09/2012 8:52:12 AM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009

It’s tragic that so many in America actually think that they still have “freedom of speech.”


25 posted on 11/09/2012 8:53:49 AM PST by Theodore R. (Once again the American people have been found sorely wanting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

And here on freepers too, apparently.


26 posted on 11/09/2012 8:55:03 AM PST by firebasecody (Orthodoxy, proclaiming the Truth since AD 33)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

I guess she never heard of Echelon?


27 posted on 11/09/2012 8:55:34 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
The word “assassination” IS a threat.

No it IS NOT! Absent the proper context it is just a word!

28 posted on 11/09/2012 8:58:20 AM PST by pgkdan (We are witnessing the modern sack of Rome. The barbarians have taken over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009
I am sure that all of the thousands of Democrats who posted death threats against Romney on Twitter are also being investigated by the Secret Service.

It is STUPID to post anything that can be construed as a death threat against anyone who is under Secret Service protection. It is like making hijacking jokes while you are getting searched by TSA at an airport. I do wish, however, that the response to such posts did not seem to be driven primarily by whether the person making the post is a liberal ("he's just blowing off steam") or a conservative ("he must be a right-wing terrorist").

29 posted on 11/09/2012 9:01:48 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009

Assassinate your Facebook account


30 posted on 11/09/2012 9:02:09 AM PST by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus
I guess she never heard of Echelon?

Probably 99% of people don't know that every email & cell phone call they make is filtered through that multinational program.

31 posted on 11/09/2012 9:13:16 AM PST by Smittie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009

the n-word = Nero


32 posted on 11/09/2012 10:01:26 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

F the President. I hear there is parade in Dallas he ought to attend. I’m sorry that is incorrect. However, I do have two tickets to a play in DC.


33 posted on 11/09/2012 10:10:46 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
So what? What she said was crude but it wasn't a threat and she should be free to say it.

And she is free to say it. It's the Secret Service's job to protect the President--whoever the President is--from threats. Part of that job is to investigate pretty much anything that could be construed as a threat against the President. The vast, vast majority of those investigations are closed without any action, or, at most, with a visit from a couple of Secret Service agents saying (in more polite, official terms), "Don't be an idiot." The fact that the Secret Service is investigating this does not mean that she is not "free to say" what she said.

Nor is the fact that Cold Stone fired her a restriction of her freedom. She is free to say what she said. Cold Stone is free to decide that they don't want to be associated with such things, and to fire her for saying it. Frankly, if I were in that position, I'd fire her too. At the very least, even if she did not intend what she wrote as a threat against the President, making such a statement publicly shows extremely poor judgment. Having an employee who is apt to demonstrate such poor judgment--especially an employee who deals with the public on a day-to-day basis--is a significant liability.

34 posted on 11/09/2012 10:22:22 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider
One incident of the N word is not grounds for firing in most states

Grounds for firing in most states are whatever the employer decides are grounds for firing. As it should be.

35 posted on 11/09/2012 10:24:48 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009

Turlock is pretty conservative and extremely poor and struggling. I pull dogs from their animal shelter and it’s a mess down there. Third World country.


36 posted on 11/09/2012 10:26:20 AM PST by MarMema (eh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider
One incident of the N word is not grounds for firing in most states

Grounds for firing in most states are whatever the employer decides are grounds for firing. As it should be.

37 posted on 11/09/2012 10:33:48 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: modernline2009
Bad form to use the n word.As for assassination that's bad form too.However,hoping for a massive fatal heart attack is just fine.Hey,if some Maoist media type can openly hope that Clarence Thomas is fed so much unhealthy food that he dies I can hope that Osama's smoking proves fatal to *him*.

Soon.

38 posted on 11/09/2012 11:50:00 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
Nor is the fact that Cold Stone fired her a restriction of her freedom. She is free to say what she said. Cold Stone is free to decide that they don't want to be associated with such things, and to fire her for saying it. Frankly, if I were in that position, I'd fire her too.

I think there's validity to what you say *if* she identified herself as being an employee of the company she worked for.If she's known on facebook by her first name and doesn't reveal where she works I think that dismissal might be unwarranted.

39 posted on 11/09/2012 11:56:15 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
If she's known on facebook by her first name and doesn't reveal where she works I think that dismissal might be unwarranted.

And you are, of course, free to think that the dismissal is unwarranted. But, it's not your call - the business owner is free to fire her if they think differently.

40 posted on 11/09/2012 12:07:32 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson