Somethings going on...(vanity)

self | 10/3/2012 | self

[Signalman]

Almost every day, we've been seeing unbelievable crowds for Romney and miniscule ones for Obama. 30,000 for Romney, 2800 for Obama.

We're told that crowd size is not scientific evidence of how the vote will turn out and it's only "anecdotal". Doesn't mean much. We're told it's the polls that tell the real story and it's close, very close.

But I can't be the only one who senses that something, way beyond what the polls are saying, is happening. Look at the size of this Colorado crowd. I think this thing could be a blowout for Romney/Ryan. I think MSDNC, DU, and the Daily Kos could be in for a bad night, a very bad night on Tuesday. And while we're celebrating, they'll be trying to figure out how it all went wrong. (Thanks to FReeper markomalley for posting this photo in a previous thread)

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Correct, crowd size doesn’t reflect massive voter fraud.

[dps.inspect]

First Vote, then go eat at Chic-fil-A to celebrate...

[G Larry]

We could be looking at the most massive vote fraud this country has ever seen.

Coud be 3% factor!!

In the swing states that could be devastating for Romney and America.

I walked precincts today with key state leaders and they’re concerned.

[cripplecreek]

Crowd size means everything during primaries but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a president fade this badly with the people and it really says something the the media keeps telling us that this is a close race.

Obama is apparently the candidate of choice with people who don’t like crowds.

[GeronL]

Look at Venezuela.

All the momentum with the opposition. All the polls showed it too.

Then Hugo wins by a landslide with results that were totally inverted from the final polling.

Probably used the same voting machines.

[Conservative Actuary]

We are taking back our country. That is what is going on. I’m 35 and this is the first Presidential election I remember where Republicans were this fired up.

[bolobaby]

You are exactly right. The liberals own the media, but they couldn’t stop Chick-fil-a Appreciation Day. That was a precursor to what is coming.

[bolobaby]

You are exactly right. The liberals own the media, but they couldn’t stop Chick-fil-a Appreciation Day. That was a precursor to what is coming.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The voters are having a tantrum again. Thank God Peter Jennings does not have to suffer through it this time.

[AdamBomb]

I totally agree. None of what the MSM is dishing up passes the smell test. In fact, it all smells like bad fish.

But everyone has their poker face on including the likes of Rasmussen. One person has called BS. Barone. No one else has.

I just don’t get it. I’ve never had such a strong intuition that we were gonna win without some stats to back it up.

Someone’s gonna be wrong on Tuesday. Either us or the MSM/pollsters etc. We shall see.

[conservativepoet]

I tend to agree with you, but I’d like to know one thing. Has Obama had any crowd sizes like this this week? If so how many? How big was the crowd at Milwaukee for instance?

I realize a few recent crowds were surprisingly small. Was that venue planned because they know he can’t get the same size crowds?

I suspect if Obama was drawing consistently equal crowds, then the MSM would be shouting this from the mountain top.

[tsowellfan]

3% voter fraud at a minimum!

Check out these stories!

http://foxnewsinsider.com/tag/voter-fraud/

KEEP WORKING like we are 10 POINTS DOWN!!!!

[DRey]

My opinion: Pollsters such as Gallup and Rasmussen have made their "Romney wins" predictions and are uncomfortable adjusting their turnout model any further. They don't want to be the big outlier. Why should they? If Romney wins 56%, so what, they're still right (and more so than others) on picking the winner. They can save face. However, polling with R+2 (which seems to be the more accurate model), makes them the outlier and laughing stock NOW.

They may be playing it safe.

Just my thoughts.

[GeronL]

lol

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

Wouldn’t a government that comes to power by fraud be considered illegitimate?

[gswilder]

The race fundamentals favor Romney. He is winning independents by double digits. Pew/Gallup/RAS are all showing the R turnout to be of 2004/2010 proportions. Crowd sizes in the closing days do matter (or at least that is what the MSM told us about O in 2008).

Republicans are doing better in Early vote/absentee than any election.

Romney is talking big, bold and futuristic. Obama looks petty and ready to go home.

This is not 2008 folks. Romney by 52-47 and 311 EV’s.

[dinoparty]

Agree. Beyond the obvious party weighting issues, I think the bigger issue is that of those Republicans who claim to be “likely” voters,almost all of them will show up, while of those Dems who claim to be likely voters, significantly fewer will show up. That’s the essence of the enthusiasm gap.

[HannibalHamlinJr]

Here's a sweeping wide-angle from a November 6th rally at the Stadium of the National Election in USA, taken November 3rd just after Romney took the Early Vote and Absentee Ballot contest in every single Nevada county, and polled a point ahead in Minnesota. Nevada goes dark red, from pink, Minnesota goes from Gray to Pink.

[Jane Long]

I walked precincts today with key state leaders and they’re concerned.

Thanks for walking precincts in CO. I don't doubt these crooks will do everything imaginable to hold on to power. What are the key state leaders doing about the concerns they have?

Seems like there would be plans and preparations for this, since we know that the threat exists.