Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/22/2012 11:22:39 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lawnguy; pandoraou812; Daffynition; barker; ferri; gjeiii; genefromjersey; texas booster; ...

pinglist


2 posted on 10/22/2012 11:25:26 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I haven’t noticed this issue on my D600, which is a great camera, and I prefer it to the D800 I’m going to sell.

The D800 has a left focus issue, which Nikon seems to be in denial about, where if the center focus sensors focus properly, when using the viewfinder, the left focus sensors when used will be out of focus.

The D800 is a great camera, and it doesn’t affect the landscape type photography I mainly do, but there are a great many photogs not happy with their $3000 paperweights.

I prefer the D600 for its smaller size and lighter weight, and the fact that it uses the ML-L3 wireless remote, about the size of a matchbook and selling for less than $15. Extremely convenient compared to the clunky and expensive rig you need to do the same thing with Nikon’s pricier cameras.

Anyway, Swampie, thanks for the heads up. I’ll keep an eye out for dust in my pics.

Later.


3 posted on 10/23/2012 1:10:40 AM PDT by moonhawk (Free Republic: Show prep for Rush Limbaugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I bought a Nikon P90 that had horrible sensor noise. I exchanged it for a new one, and it’s sensor noise was even worse.

I’ll never buy another piece of Nikon again.


5 posted on 10/23/2012 3:13:19 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
The 600 is out of my price range but if I had one of these I would go ballistic.

And I mean.. BALLISTIC!! As in; a Saturn V rocket taking off, Krakatoa Erupting, our biggest Nuke going off, and Space Aliens fighting a battle on planet earth!

And I'd prolly wind up in jail for Assault With A Faulty Camera.

9 posted on 10/23/2012 4:25:34 AM PDT by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

For a short while I worked in the repair/rental part of a camera shop.

We’d get these old SLRs whose internal materials had deteriorated; especially foam rubber light seals and mirror dampers.

Some of them would turn to mush and/or flake off in little bits.

Maybe the Nikons mentioned have an internal materials problem that is shedding these little bits and pieces. Shame, if so.

Does any camera manufacturer have some purposely sticky stuff inside the image box to trap and hold debris? Directly under a self-cleaning sensor would seem to be a good place for it. Of course, the camera maker would have to make sure the the sticky stuff would have a long lifetime without becoming a contamination source in its own right. (3M lo-tack chemist, please pick up the nearest white courtesy phone.)

Lenses are another source of entry for environmental contaminants. Lots of lenses, especially zooms, work like bellows as their front barrels move to and fro. Some of the pro lenses have sealing of some sort, but it’s tricky when the internal volume of the lens changes as a result of either focusing or zooming.


18 posted on 10/23/2012 7:57:17 AM PDT by Erasmus (Zwischen des Teufels und des tiefen, blauen Meers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson