Comic books are for kids.
Well, who knows? We have yet to see it.
I have, however, been through a two week splurge of all the Bond movies being played and replayed on my G-Sat here in the Philippines.
The most significant reset of the 23-film series that's unconnected to a change of the actor playing 007, this long-awaited third outing for Daniel Craig feels more seriously connected to real-world concerns than any previous entry, despite the usual outlandish action scenes, glittering settings and larger-than-life characters.
Dramatically gripping while still brandishing a droll undercurrent of humor, this beautifully made film will certainly be embraced as one of the best Bonds by loyal fans worldwide and leaves you wanting the next one to turn up sooner than four years from now.
A Saturday afternoon double bill - “Dr. No” and “From Russia With Love.”
I never thought they'd find anyone who could compete with Sean Connery - though Pierce Brosnan came close.
Then Daniel Craig showed up.
This guy has brought a whole new brand of physical toughness and sex appeal to the role.
The theme song “You only Skyfall once” is superb!
Craig is the perfect man for the role. The best Bond ever. Yum, ;)
Nothing gets me into the theaters but I’ll be seeing Skyfall for sure. It looks dark and depressing but>>> Sean Connery and the others had a lot more joy bedding the Bond girls but>>>>>
My favorite Bond theme by Duran Duran. They should be brought back to do another. This is the only Bond theme to go to #1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp4CR2HcHLQ
I love the strings on this that rise making the temperature hotter. Strings added by John Barry much to Duran’s surprise
“into a blistering comic book escapade that the old Bond, and one suspects Fleming too, would find altogether alien.”
Wasn’t Tyler Perry responsible for this? What would one expect?
Daniel Craig is a very vocal worshiper of Obama. That ruins him for me.
It was all downhill for Bond after they made From Russia With Love.
Why do the press and media let the producers claim the title “official” film when there have been 24 previous films including one with sc they are not counting?
James Bond could be in for one heck of a makeover with Skyfall, his twenty-third outing (and no, were not referring to his wardrobe). Director Sam Mendes (American Beauty, Road to Perdition) may seem an odd choice for a Bond film, but while his style may be deemed artsy by casual moviegoers, hes taking inspiration from one director known for blending blockbuster action with poignant filmmaking.
The James Bond series has turned actors into household names, yet the ones behind the camera have garnered much less attention. That might make Sam Mendes role seem less significant in the long run, but that could be about to change assuming Mendes can recreate even an ounce of the movies hes turning to for inspiration.
As promotion of Skyfall has picked up speed, the largest source of enthusiasm and commitment to putting James Bond back on the right tracks has been coming directly from Mendes. Even when discussing the authentic London locations being used for filming, the man at the wheel seems as pleased as a kid in a candy store. But apparently, his thoughts on the project werent always so positive.
Mendes explained to ThePlaylist that his spot in the directors chair came with some trepidation, and while the job may be one that many filmmakers dream of attaining, he wasnt so optimistic:
I was never interested and I dont think I saw most of the Pierce Brosnan films [...] I was not into them at the time and then when Daniel got cast I was interested because he was a friend and I had worked with him. And I thought, Wow, thats interesting. I was on record as saying that I didnt think he was good casting. Then I saw it and was blown away and was suddenly interested again, as a character, and eager to see the next one. I was slightly disappointed with Quantum of Solace although I think its got a bit of a short shrift, theres a lot in it thats interesting. But when I met with Daniel and he asked whether or not I was interested in doing it, I found myself saying yes very quickly. It was just good timing.
Mendes decision to jump on board was a risky one, since he rightly points out that the reception to Bonds last adventure was lukewarm at best. But those who felt that the first Skyfall trailer revealing the diabolical Raoul Silva (Javier Bardem) seemed more Nolan-esque than Bond-ish may have been right on the money.
The strength of story, drama and compelling turmoil that director Christopher Nolan brought into the Batman mythos directly inspired Mendes in his view of the Bond series. Not just as a sign that tired properties can still have potential, but what can be attempted when studio dollars are on the line.
As Mendes sees it, the precedent has been set for directors like himself to bring more artistic flourishes to mainstream projects. What that means for Skyfall isnt clear, but does sound promising:
In terms of what [Nolan] achieved, specifically The Dark Knight, the second movie, what it achieved, which is something exceptional. It was a game changer for everybody
Were now in an industry where movies are very small or very big and theres almost nothing in the middle [...] it would be a tragedy if all the serious movies were very small and all the popcorn movies were very big and have nothing to say. And what Nolan proved was that you can make a huge movie that is thrilling and entertaining and has a lot to say about the world we live in, even if, in the case with The Dark Knight, its not even set in our world. It felt like a movie that was about our world post-9/11, and played on our fears, and discussed our fears and why they existed and I thought that was incredibly brave and interesting. That did help give me the confidence to take this movie in directions that, without The Dark Knight, might not have been possible. Because also, people go, Wow, thats pretty dark, but then you can point to Dark Knight and go Look at that thats a darker movie, and it took in a gazillion dollars! Thats very helpful. Theres also that thing its clearly possible to make a dark movie that people want to see.
Nolans accomplishments extend far beyond producing one of the most taut and chilling character dramas the comic book genre has ever seen. The success and praise earned by Inception a story Nolan thought up himself showed that in an age of sequels, reboots and adaptations, an original script can still earn almost a billion dollars at the box office.
It would be optimistic to think that Skyfall can do the same, but everything shown so far pays testament to Mendes wishes of making a big fabulous escapist movie. The over-the-top action scenes may set a new standard for Bonds theatrics, but the film isnt forgetting its heritage either. The new beginning for Bond may not please every fan, but the fact that it will be forgoing 3D (and the attached profits) when it hits theaters should earn some goodwill.
Is Christopher Nolans influence starting to seep into too many other franchises, or should directors take inspiration from wherever they can? Think the tone could work for this darker chapter of James Bonds life, or may only weigh down a plot that should be fun above all else?
Skyfall will be in theaters and IMAX on November 9, 2012.
I like the theme song:
“From Mister Skyfall
Pretty girl, beware of his heart of sky
This heart is fall”
What?
Another James Bond thread on FR??
*sigh*
Time to make myself another Vesper...
;-)
Will the media stop letting the producers count Bond films and declare theirs the “official” or “franchise.” This will be the 25th film.
Just back from seeing this (it was released in the UK on Friday, will be released in the US later)
Brilliant, absolutely superb.
The acting is superb from Craig, villain Javier Bardem and everyone. The script is superb, with a depth usually not seen in a Bond film. The story gives a depth to Bond, literally going back to his (Scottish) roots.
There are some lovely jokes and little nods to the Bond canon. Any Bond film which can include a passage from Tennyson and have your patriotic blood surge as a result is doing something right.
The cinema I was in actually cheered at a couple of the scenes. And had a lump in its collective throat at another.
The action sequences are pure Bond, but also contemporary.
No CGI, they are lean, hard and even brutal. The jokes are nicely spaced and the gadgets are kept to a minimum (which they even poke fun at...)
This is the ‘proper Bond’ of Fleming’s novels.
Go see it when it comes out.
How good is it?.
I am 90 mins out of the cinema, and I am going to go and see it again this week.