Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2012 3:12:03 PM PDT by BruceDeitrickPrice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Was the test conducted in Denver? Maybe the women got there first and acclimated.


2 posted on 10/05/2012 3:13:12 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Ambassador Stevens is dead and the Chevy Volt is alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

The reading disparity has a LOT to do with the fact that the PC croud has neutered all of the books in the ciriculum. Boys will read what interests them and Little House on the Prarie wont do it for most boys. My son is currently going through my old stash of Shadowrun books and loves them.


3 posted on 10/05/2012 3:16:20 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice; Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows
Are the numbers going up or are men just testing dumber now?


4 posted on 10/05/2012 3:20:00 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Back in the 60s I took a course in testing which included IQ tests.

One thing which stuck in my mind was that boys and girls both scored nearly the same with girls just barely doing better.

On the other hand, People with exceptionally high IQs favored males by a huge number.


5 posted on 10/05/2012 3:20:12 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Saw projections that women will earn 60% of college degrees in ten years.


6 posted on 10/05/2012 3:20:13 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Hmm. Okay.

Next.


8 posted on 10/05/2012 3:23:42 PM PDT by Tuanedge (Warriors victorious in a hundred battles, flee when a tiger enters their tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
Women Beat Men on IQ Tests for First Time... But Why??

Becasue the test was based on memory and the question was what did your husband do wrong 10 years ago.

9 posted on 10/05/2012 3:27:55 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Because we like beer and Internet porn better. :)


10 posted on 10/05/2012 3:29:47 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Because boys are ignored in the schools? Because emasculated boys grow up confused? Because men have been beaten into submission in the workplace? Because television and commercials portray men as idiots? Because men are denied by society the right to exercise their proper role in society? By the way, if men were smarter what would that get them? Hired? Probably not in today’s workplace. Okay, fire away with ‘baggage’ ‘poor baby’ and other various poison arrows everyone!


11 posted on 10/05/2012 3:37:42 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
because it's THEIR TURN...
12 posted on 10/05/2012 3:42:29 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice; GeronL
Because girls pay attention in class while boys misbehave. Girls want to “please the teacher” while boys are being boys.

In the old days when boys were being boys they got whacked with the board of education, now they are drugged into oblivion. With their brains fried how do you expect them to learn?

14 posted on 10/05/2012 3:46:18 PM PDT by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Without knowing the precise nature of the test and the composition of the sample population, it’s difficult to determine why the results came out as they did, and what the results signal or don’t signal.

Was the test reading-based? (I’ve had IQ tests that were symbolic rather than verbal.) Were the subjects of the same age? What age? Were the results compared against those of a similar population over time? What about the same people tested over time?

All sorts of interesting information could be gathered, if people really wanted it.


15 posted on 10/05/2012 3:48:01 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Optimism is much shallower than hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
(In the book Why Johnny Still Can't Read, Rudolf Flesch tells the astonishing story of a woman who graduated from Barnard College able to read novels for pleasure in French and other European languages. When she read novels in English, her native language, she got headaches and eye strain. Almost all sight-word readers report similar ailments. Remarkably, this woman actually reached the age of 36 without realizing that what she did with French words, she could do with English words. That is, read them phonetically. The horrific point is, Whole Word can hide the true nature of reading from even the smartest people.)
From my experience at the turn of the millennium, Barnard girls were hardly the "smartest people"
Whole word is a joke. I have an IQ of 145. I was needed extra help with "whole word" reading. The tutor threw out the whole word crap, and taught be phonics in two hours. I was getting gold stars in no time. Math was another issue. I was bored silly and got punished for wanting to use class time in a subject I knew to do my Hebrew homework, which I found harder. Even private schools are not above this silliness.
21 posted on 10/05/2012 4:08:21 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

I’m not surprised. While I’m sure the majority of replies is going to center around the so-called “war against boys” and other nonsense, my experience raising children gives me an insight into this issue.

Since the early 90’s, I’ve seen video games literally consume the lives of young boys, while young girls have not been drawn into that culture to nearly the degree that boys are.

Girls today are more driven than they ever were, whereas boys might as well be wearing neon signs that read, “Entertain me.”


25 posted on 10/05/2012 4:21:50 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
I'd bet dollars to doughnut holes that they changed what the test measures.
29 posted on 10/05/2012 4:35:53 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
Any research that reaches a conclusion so thrilling to the left should be viewed with suspicion. I suspect random isn't so much as far as the males here, and I suspect other factors are at play as well.

It has long been confirmed that females tend to the middle of the curve, with males being more broadly represented. This means far more geniuses are male, but it also means more idiots are as well.

The question should be, just what would lop off the higher end of male scores yet be subtle enough that biased researchers felt secure in publishing this?

Skew in the direction of a desired, a priori conclusion could have been introduced by choosing a methodology that (oops) unintentionally excluded certain identifiable groups with a better than average likelihood of higher IQ.

That's one way to get from point A to point B.

30 posted on 10/05/2012 4:36:20 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Women outscoring men on IQ tests by 1/2 or 1 point = important. It explains all kinds of things that are going on in the world.

Whites outscoring blacks by 15+ points, and Jews outscoring gentiles by roughly the same number, steady over five decades = not important, explains nothing about how the world works, and who succeeds and who doesn’t.


35 posted on 10/05/2012 5:37:04 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
Men share their major blood flow with two thought processing centers of the body, right? And when women are around, well, we lose upper IQ.

I know I can certainly attest to this, as many times the sun rose and I realized the sad ignorance caused by the unequal dispersion of said blood.

But I still bragged to my buddies...

39 posted on 10/05/2012 6:26:01 PM PDT by IrishPennant (Are you behind a "Blade of Grass?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

We continually hear talk about the “dumbing down” of America, but this has not just been a concerted effort by the left to hamper learning and introduce liberal indoctrination into the education system. It’s also a lack of strong fatherly figures and lowered testosterone levels... No joke and sad but true... The neutering of America...


44 posted on 10/05/2012 7:01:26 PM PDT by hope_dies_last
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Maybe it is because as more women gain higher authority they have changed what they consider important, like liberal PC ideas?


49 posted on 10/06/2012 8:15:41 AM PDT by CodeToad (Padme: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson