Posted on 09/21/2012 5:54:57 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Houston area investigators are looking into a stand-your-ground case where after a minor fender-bender, a 22-year-old white male was shot and killed by a 23-year-old black woman. During a morning commute, Crystal Scott and Jonathan Ables were in an accident and pulled into a Shell gasoline station to survey the damage.
According to Scott, Ables exited his truck and ran toward her driver-side door. Scott said he yelled and then hit her door and tried to open it. Fearing for her life, Scott pulled her pistol and shot Ables once through the driver’s window and struck him in the chest. Ables died at the scene.
A Harris County Sheriff’s spokesman, Sgt. Felipe Rivera said “From what we understand it was maybe just a minor accident,” while adding, “The information we’re getting is that it appeared to be a minor accident that turned into road rage.”
>snip<
An eyewitness, who appeared on camera but has requested anonymity, said that he did not hear any threat in the seconds before Scott killed Ables. The witness was pumping gas and standing 15 feet away from Ables when a bullet ricocheted past him and struck his car. The bullet left a noticeable impression on the witness’s car.
As for Scott’s version of events, the witness said that if Ables had shouted or banged on the car, he would have heard it. “What drew my attention was the gunshot,” said the witness. “I just want to be sure that I do everything in my power that everything is fair. I care about it being fair,” he said. The Harris County sheriff’s department has not yet responded to Spero News’ request for any security footage of the shooting.
(Excerpt) Read more at speroforum.com ...
The testimony of the two bullets in his chest and the one bullethole and its placement in the side window of her car. Is that witness enough???
Figure it out, little boy.
Difference of night and day.
Nope, Both have self-serving interests. There is no difference at all, at least not in the real world.
How would you know about the real world??? You don't live there.
Now, back to my original question. You say that Scott has reason to lie about what happened but Zimmerman does not ---- why is that?
Sorry I missed your humor -— “Difference of night and day” —— Night and day.... Black and white -— very clever.
________________________________
Since you are discussing your efforts to get me banned, why not come out in the open and let me and JR know about your little power push?
Remember, be careful, this type of childishness can be addictive to some personalities.
I already have said it openly. I don’t do this for everyone, just trolls. You don’t belong on this forum.
Irony is so ironic.
You racism-imaging fact-free Race-Troll.
You still missed it and race-baiters like you will probably never get it.
________________________________
Racism doesn't belong on this forum. You are free to argue otherwise of course. You can start with your defense of this...
"Sometimes it's hard to see past the blackness: we do have a tendency to assume all black males are high testosterone potential rapists."
Oh, wait, you already did.
You made the statement and have done everything you can to avoid answering. I'll make it easy for you...
"Scott has reason to lie about what happened because_____________________."
There, got it started for you.
See Jim? This is Race Trolling.
After repeatedly telling the Race Troll that I do not defend that sentiment, but that the original poster posted an article that HAPPENED to have that sentiment in it -- and by the way the original author of that sentence happens to be black himself -- and that the postwe who posted the whole article should not be accused of racism..... and wtc911 Race Trolls me again.
I shouldn't have to put up with that, and we shouldn't have Race Trolls on the forum. I'm sick of liberals and the false claims of racism they lob at everyone.
<>”Scott has reason to lie about what happened because_____________________.”<>
She shot once in the car and then got out of the car and pumped two bullets in his chest. That is murder not self defense as she and her lawyer are claiming:
MrTeymour 5:29 PM on September 21, 2012:
I am appauled at my fellow gun lovers that spew thier garbage before getting all the facts in a case. This lady had many other choices than to shoot this young man. The info I have , that came from a family member of the young man that was shot, reflects that the story written here is a bit mis-leading at best. No where did it mention that she actually missed with the first shot, but she did chase the young man away with that shot. Then she got out of her car and chased him and then shot and killed him. I have a hard time understanding why this would be considered self defense. In my mind, she committed murder or manslaughter at least. It is cases like this one that will destroy the ability of the law abiding citizen to protect ourselves.
______________________________
Proof?
Man, you’re nothing but a race-baiting hater.
Read the article.
Forensic evidence does not lie in this case or in the Zimmerman case.
If you have a link that supports your statement that she shot him once from the car then got out and shot him twice on the ground then please provide it.
My bet is that you don't.
<>If you have a link that supports your statement that she shot him once from the car then got out and shot him twice on the ground then please provide it.<>
I guess you missed this from the Chronicle:
“Sheriff’s deputies found the man in the Shell parking lot with what appeared to be two gunshot wounds to his upper chest area.”
And the picture in here of the drivers side window showing only one bullet hole that went apparently into the frame:
http://diwataman.wordpress.com/2012/09/18/black-woman-stands-her-ground-kills-white-man/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.