Posted on 09/11/2012 5:43:30 AM PDT by opentalk
After rejection by USA Today, Washington Post, New York Times
The New York Post has accepted a full-page ad declaring Barack Obama’s real biological father is the late Communist Party activist Frank Marshall Davis, not the Kenyan Barack Hussein Obama.
Filmmaker Joel Gilbert makes the case in his full-length documentary “Dreams from My Real Father: A Story of Reds and Deception.”The ad will run in the Post’s New York City, national and international editions Tuesday and Sunday.
Convincing the newspaper to accept the full-page ad required Gilbert to go personally to the Post’s main editorial office in Manhattan. “It took a lot of discussion ”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Vetting Obama to peel back Axelrod/Ayers/MSM storyline. May help expose what they do not want known.
I know conspiracies against BO are popular here, but I have to frankly state I don’t believe this.
I don’t like Stanley, think she was in rebellion against every tradition she could find, and I see lots of proof she hated America. But I don’t see the reasoning behind the deception, and after seeing Obama’s brother in Africa - heck, they SOUND alike, they have the same mannerisms.
Yes. And that would make his bc a confirmed forgery.
Washington Post and USA today are both running ads by Larry Flynt Offering $1 Million for Dirt on Romney's Finances.
I have always thought that the effort to hide the birth certificate and make the issue about place of birth, a cover up for this. Obama’s handlers, grooming him for political power for decades, realized the inflammatory nature of having Davis as his father. So THEY made the narrative about place of birth, knowing that the evidence would be found to prove it and make the right look like fools.
Please point me to the section of the Constitution where it indicates a “law breaker” is ineligible to be President.
Pause this at 2:19 and study it intently for a minute or two. Strong resemblance indeed.
I recommend people watch the film and make up their own minds. I personally found it quite logical and therefore compelling. I recently read Paul Kengor's book, "The Communist" and there is nothing that I can see looking at the two narratives that rules this scenario out.
"It was as if I were witnessing some complicated, unspoken transaction between the two men."
Thanks for putting this up, opentalk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.