To: Berlin_Freeper
We are publishing the photos because we think Sun readers have a right to see them The next issue will have the report "Prince Harry in his bathroom".
To: Berlin_Freeper
I've been seeing these stories lately about the guy with nude photos. How did all this start?
At first I took it as maybe he was going to be posing nude for some event and the Palace warned him not to.
I guess I assumed wrong. They must have been rumors about leaked photos someone took of him nude or something?
Did he allow the photos to be taken from inside?
Or were these photos taken from outside without his knowledge?
3 posted on
08/24/2012 1:13:32 AM PDT by
tsowellfan
(Voting for Obama/Biden is like purposely swallowing two tapeworms)
To: Berlin_Freeper
The world is going to Hell and we obsess over prurient pictures on the internet.
4 posted on
08/24/2012 1:14:16 AM PDT by
iowamark
To: Berlin_Freeper
Big deal. The Emperor had no clothes, either.
5 posted on
08/24/2012 1:18:54 AM PDT by
Safetgiver
( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
At least he wasn’t wearing a Nazi uniform......
Big deal...I thought what happened in Vegas was supposed to stay in Vegas.....
6 posted on
08/24/2012 1:18:57 AM PDT by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimeticare Iddio!!!!!!)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Who wouldn’t want to see the Crown Jewels?
10 posted on
08/24/2012 1:41:45 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
...’much ado about nothing’.
15 posted on
08/24/2012 2:07:57 AM PDT by
exPBRrat
To: Berlin_Freeper
He is not real bright.
He had to know there were photographers present or that someone would be taking pictures.
17 posted on
08/24/2012 2:59:30 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(My vote in Nov will be dictated by my extreme hatred for ZERO and what he is doing to our country.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
We are publishing the photos because we think Sun readers have a right to see them. These journos really do think we are all utterly stupid don't they?
We think Sun readers have a right to see them...sure...material gain via low-level titillation is NO factor at all...
18 posted on
08/24/2012 3:01:54 AM PDT by
Vanders9
To: Berlin_Freeper
Did anybody see the pics, was it Hairy?
19 posted on
08/24/2012 3:02:37 AM PDT by
urbanpovertylawcenter
(where the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
To: Berlin_Freeper
A “right” to see naked photos of a celebrity??? Sounds like something the leftists on our Supreme Court would conjure up.
To: Berlin_Freeper
a right to see them
pure trash
voyeurism
yech
32 posted on
08/24/2012 4:54:43 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Berlin_Freeper
While I am not a prude, having been to nude beaches myself, I think the Harry public affair is just another example of the rapid decay of western civilization.
As debauchery becomes accepted behavior for all of society, it is just another chink in the fabric that made us great.
34 posted on
08/24/2012 5:02:55 AM PDT by
AlexW
To: Berlin_Freeper
40 posted on
08/24/2012 5:32:25 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: Berlin_Freeper
Ok one:
- He is 28 I believe (God I feel old lol)
- This young man loves his country to fight for it.
- He is SINGLE as my mama said if a man is single he is free do to whatever, once he is married that is another thing.
Yes it was stupid for him to play along in Strip Billiard or whatever they were playing but I also believe he drank so from what I read he may have been drunk so he was not thinking straight.
To: Berlin_Freeper
Yeh, I agree. The British taxpayers have a right to see how their tax dollars are being spent.
51 posted on
08/24/2012 7:49:40 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
“It’s Good to be the future King.”
55 posted on
08/24/2012 1:23:50 PM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson