Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chick-Fil-A Question: Can businesses kick out patrons improperly dressed or engaged in lewd conduct
FaceBook Gay/Lesbian Pages ^ | August 1, 2012 | Vanity

Posted on 08/01/2012 9:58:21 AM PDT by topher

The above picture is what some gays/lesbians are calling on for dress on Fridays when going to Chick Fil-A

My question is whether businesses have the right to require a dress code, and also be allowed to expel patrons for lewd behavior.

There are Gay/Lesbian groups calling for boycotting/protests at Chick-Fil-A restaurants every Friday.

What rights do businesses have today?

Does this vary depending on the state?

Can very skimpy dress (bikinis, etc) be grounds for expelling people from the business?

What about behavior by adults that would be bad examples and considered lewd behavior in front of children.

There are a number of Facebook pages being put together over this issue.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: business; chickfila; gay; lesbian; propertyrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: topher

Short answer? Businesses have the right to regulate behavior on their premises that might adversely affect their business. That was in the old days ...

But that said, keep in mind that the actions of other PATRONS are not the actions of the BUSINESS. If an employee tells some fag to get out, it could be trouble. But if another patron were to stand outside the door and insult the fags as they came in, or to tell them to knock off the tongue-wrestling because it was making them sick, the business is not directly involved.

Point is: take the matter into your own hands (so to speak). Stand up for CFA; don’t wait for CFA to stand up for you.


21 posted on 08/01/2012 10:27:00 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

I don’t know what the legal standing is but I remember years ago that clubs and restaurants could, and did demand proper dress such as black tie only, or no polyester allowed, no jeans allowed..

I see on stores signs that say things like “No shirt, no shoes, no service’.

I’ve known of higher end places that might not tell you that you look like a slob, but they wouldn’t come and get you for a table either. They’d either tell you that it’s a 4 hour wait, or just leave you in the lobby till you left of your own accord.

The reason I say ‘years ago’ is to establish that it’s not a new thing as a result in a loss of freedom, but that it has been a customary practice at some establishments for a very long time.

I know that schools, hospitals, and other businesses DO have dress codes for students and employees, and that health ordinances do demand certain dress codes for health and safety reasons, under certain circumstances.


22 posted on 08/01/2012 10:27:23 AM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Most in the gay parades seem to be clothing challenged. So if this or any other place said “no shirt no shoes” they are abiding by the Health Department codes and may turn away people for this reason. Would hope the police would enforce laws against public nudity as well seeing that is a food place.


23 posted on 08/01/2012 10:29:12 AM PDT by Morgana (This space for rent. Cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2

“I see on stores signs that say things like “No shirt, no shoes, no service’.”

This is a Health Department law not just a store rule!!


24 posted on 08/01/2012 10:31:49 AM PDT by Morgana (This space for rent. Cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: topher

This is a budding disaster for the left!

Decades of pro-gay agitprop will come undone as patrons openly mock and ridicule them, potentially at hundreds of sites, all on the same day.


25 posted on 08/01/2012 10:53:35 AM PDT by Stalwart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
If the facebook picture is what you intended to post, Yes Chick-fil-A does not have to “serve” these people dressed or not dressed as they are. It is a clear violation of health and safety regulations all food related businesses must follow.
But what would gays care about health and safety of the public.
26 posted on 08/01/2012 10:54:24 AM PDT by lucky american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZirconEncrustedTweezers

“Queer people’s money spends the same as everyone else’s.”

LMAO

Thats the answer the clerk should give when one these perverts announces that they have arrived at Chik-Fil-A

Or counter protesters with big signs say the samething


27 posted on 08/01/2012 11:14:51 AM PDT by BubbaJunebug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: topher

That is because sodomites are basically exhibitionists at heart.


28 posted on 08/01/2012 11:53:21 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Tyrannies demand immense sacrifices of their people to produce trifles.-Marquis de Custine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

...and if I walk by and trip and my milkshake lands on them? I’m 70, I trip a lot.


29 posted on 08/01/2012 12:48:44 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

“Can businesses kick out patrons improperly dressed or engaged in lewd conduct?”

The managers best phrase: “I’m gonna have to ask you to leave. Right now.”


30 posted on 08/01/2012 12:54:29 PM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

I’ve seen signs in restaurants that require shirts and shoes or sandals. I believe those rules are based on health laws. With that in mind, I’d say that they could also decline admittance to anyone in a bikini, citing health laws as well. I’d check into the decency and health department laws in your area to see which laws could apply to this situation.


31 posted on 08/01/2012 2:23:48 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
i'm pretty sure they could get somebody to volunteer to be a door bouncer to keep the filthy scum out...
32 posted on 08/01/2012 2:44:46 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: topher

If nothing else, they should be allowed to require that customers actually be customers, and not just loiterers.


33 posted on 08/01/2012 8:43:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

The above picture is a little red X in a double box...


34 posted on 08/01/2012 10:21:20 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
Starbucks: "We comply with local laws and statutes in all the communities we serve."

FWIW...The gay-rights debate belongs in the legislatures and courts, not in the stores/restaurants.

35 posted on 08/01/2012 10:31:50 PM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson