I’ve never understood the standards here. We’re allowed to show a crucifix in urine and call it art. We’re allowed to show the Virgin Mary with dung on her image. And that’s art, and nobody is supposed to say anything.
But it’s a terrible offense against Islam to show the image of Mohammed. And we’re not supposed to do that, so as not to offend Muslims. But we are allowed to deeply offend Christians by showing a crucifix in urine.
I’ve never understood the standards here. We’re allowed to show a crucifix in urine and call it art. We’re allowed to show the Virgin Mary with dung on her image. And that’s art, and nobody is supposed to say anything.
But it’s a terrible offense against Islam to show the image of Mohammed. And we’re not supposed to do that, so as not to offend Muslims. But we are allowed to deeply offend Christians by showing a crucifix in urine.
Before anyone makes an attempt at drawing Mohammed. They should read freerepublic thread: “Why invent Mohammed,” May 18, 2012.
Maybe, Mohammed didn’t exist as currently depicted.
They deserve to be completely ignored. We need to stop stoking the fire and just ignore them for Christ sake. And when they get tired of being ignored, reek havoc on the populace, we should teach them that being ignored is alot better than being hauled out of this country back to their former tent city dead or alive, that we will let them choose. But like the good 70 virgin pyschopaths they are, they would choose crispy vrgins in hell over returning to the dust-fill Earthly hell they were living.
Sweet! Last year I drew Mohammed “riding” his camel on a post-in note.
Now I’ll have to figure out how to top that for this year.