Skip to comments.
Bloody battle between neighbours sees man's arm almost severed with a chain saw...
Mailonline.com ^
| May 2, 2012
| Richard Shears
Posted on 05/02/2012 5:24:49 AM PDT by TYVets
In a bloody battle between two warring neighbours in Australia today, one man's arm was almost severed with a chain saw, while another had a finger chopped off with a Samurai sword.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: australia; banglist; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Take away the guns and people are safe.
1
posted on
05/02/2012 5:24:56 AM PDT
by
TYVets
To: TYVets
You might want to take away the chain saws as well.
2
posted on
05/02/2012 5:33:00 AM PDT
by
DooDahhhh
(ma)
To: TYVets
3
posted on
05/02/2012 5:35:12 AM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: TYVets
4
posted on
05/02/2012 5:37:01 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Ubama is America's first openly gay President.)
To: TYVets
Never bring a sword to a chain saw fight...
5
posted on
05/02/2012 5:40:28 AM PDT
by
outofsalt
("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
To: TYVets
When I was in Australia a few years back, I was amazed at how many people were beaten to death by golf clubs, cricket bats, chairs, and pipes.
As we all know (but Liberals don't) -- Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
6
posted on
05/02/2012 5:40:46 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
To: TYVets
one man's arm was almost severed with a chain saw, while another had a finger chopped off with a Samurai sword
Arm/finger. We now know which movie got it right.
7
posted on
05/02/2012 5:46:21 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
To: TYVets
Whata crazy story.
First peopledo not keep chainsaws lying within easy reach in the house, so this guy didn’t just grab the chain saw for self-defense, It was a deliberate act to go an get it.
Then at the end they are saying that now people in Australia should be licensed to operate a chain saw. Give me a break.
Instruction in the use of a chain saw is certainly not a bad idea, many people get injured by them because they do not know how to use them properly, but a license to operate one? That is a bit ludicrous.
8
posted on
05/02/2012 5:47:14 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: BykrBayb
After being accidental cut with a chain saw all I can say is ouch.
To: TYVets
10
posted on
05/02/2012 5:49:27 AM PDT
by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: TYVets
Did a “Needful Things” shop open up in Australia?
11
posted on
05/02/2012 6:00:02 AM PDT
by
methodic_progression
(the fight for life is always real, i cant believe its no big deal, its a legal kill - King's X)
To: Venturer
...but a license to operate one? That is a bit ludicrous. Ludicrous is when they make you store the Bar & Chain in one safe, the motor in another and the gasoline in a gas safe under lock and key in your house.
12
posted on
05/02/2012 6:13:23 AM PDT
by
TYVets
(Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
To: TYVets
Men. Chainsaws. Heh.
13
posted on
05/02/2012 6:28:34 AM PDT
by
Daffynition
(Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
To: liberalh8ter
14
posted on
05/02/2012 6:32:52 AM PDT
by
al_c
(http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
To: TYVets
Good grief, I think I’d rather take my changes with getting shot!
15
posted on
05/02/2012 6:38:07 AM PDT
by
Titan Magroyne
(What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
To: Titan Magroyne
Oops.
Chances.
16
posted on
05/02/2012 6:39:53 AM PDT
by
Titan Magroyne
(What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
To: al_c
17
posted on
05/02/2012 7:01:27 AM PDT
by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: Venturer
First peopledo not keep chainsaws lying within easy reach in the house, so this guy didn’t just grab the chain saw for self-defense, It was a deliberate act to go an get it.The article says the guy with the chain saw didn't grab it in an act of self-defense, he took it with him when he went to the swordsman's home.
Even in Florida or a Castle Doctrine state, I think the swordsman could claim self-defense but the guy with the chain saw couldn't.
Cut my own heating wood for 10 years, so am intimately familiar with chainsaws. Would not be my first choice as a weapon.
To: Daffynition
This could cause one to reconsider the practice of eugenics.
19
posted on
05/02/2012 8:17:41 AM PDT
by
W. W. SMITH
(Maybe the horse will learn to sing)
To: BykrBayb
20
posted on
05/02/2012 8:19:37 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
