Help !
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Robert Drobot
How did you record it? Is it a digital recording?
2 posted on
04/23/2012 4:04:20 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Robert Drobot
If you can make out the message audibly it is not subliminal by definition.
3 posted on
04/23/2012 4:05:06 AM PDT by
.30Carbine
(God bless you with the spirit of wisdom and understanding)
To: Robert Drobot
It’s already on YouTube. Search “Chantix Deception”
4 posted on
04/23/2012 4:06:26 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
To: All
I want to bring the public’s attention to the use of this deceptive practice by putting it on the internet, and thereby bring the media screaming and kicking to acknowledge the use of their medium ( television )to deceptively influence voter decision making.
5 posted on
04/23/2012 4:09:41 AM PDT by
Robert Drobot
(Fiat voluntas tua)
To: Robert Drobot
6 posted on
04/23/2012 4:11:48 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Robert Drobot
If you play the commercial backwards does it say I buried Vince Foster?
7 posted on
04/23/2012 4:12:34 AM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Robert Drobot
Have you ever listened to the warnings on the Chantix commercial?
Afterwhich, a reasonable person would never by Chantix or Obama....
8 posted on
04/23/2012 4:13:19 AM PDT by
nevergore
("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
To: Robert Drobot
Are you sure this isn't an advertiser's gimmick to get people to watch the ad on YouTube?
11 posted on
04/23/2012 4:25:45 AM PDT by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: Robert Drobot
12 posted on
04/23/2012 4:32:54 AM PDT by
Pan_Yans Wife
("For the sake of our party we must stand united, whoever our nominee is."-Sarah Palin)
To: Robert Drobot
my son and I caught this about a month ago!! OMG. We both kept saying ‘did you hear that...obama support’ every time the ad played.
unbelievable.
To: Robert Drobot
Clearly heard it on the youtube.
16 posted on
04/23/2012 5:07:33 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: Robert Drobot
It says “Along with support Chantix has proven.....”
Jeeeeez!
To: Robert Drobot
I always thought it said something like that but with some hearing loss I was never sure.
19 posted on
04/23/2012 5:23:27 AM PDT by
Qwackertoo
(Gingrich/West 2012)
To: Robert Drobot
Dude. Yer a nut. It’s “Along with support”.
20 posted on
04/23/2012 5:24:20 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Robert Drobot
I don’t hear “Obama” I hear, “Along with”. This strikes me as lawyer-ese hedging where they fear stating something definite exposes them to potential false-advertising claims. So they insert some “cover our butt” weasel language as civil liabilty risk management.
The nebulously phrased “Along with support” gives the company a broad range of definitions that means everything and nothing, depending on if the lawyer is arguing on behalf of, or against, the pharma co.
So I can certainly take issue with the snake-oil pitch they are making, but I doubt very seriously it has anything at all to do with Obama.
To: Robert Drobot
I have listened 3 times and I hear “OK lets go”, then the woman begins to speak.
22 posted on
04/23/2012 5:36:39 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: Robert Drobot
Along with support.... You might someday stop pointing your camcorder at your TV and posting it on Youtube. What’s wrong with people?
To: Robert Drobot
Those dastardly villains will stop at nothing. Just last week they hacked Rush Limbaugh's car's bluetooth to put in the message "Obama's minions are taking control and there is nothing you can do about it!"
27 posted on
04/23/2012 6:47:59 AM PDT by
FreeAtlanta
(Liberty and Justice for ALL)
To: Robert Drobot
Been there, done that...read the book...
The author kept trying to convince the reader there were hidden images in advertising manipulating our brains. I bought the book because I believed it was happening, but after reading the book, realized it was the author who was seeing things that didn't exist.
He had print ads in the book and pointed out the hidden images within by using a "before and after". It was like finding images in clouds. It was nonsense.
And last time I checked, the effectiveness of "subliminal advertising" (hidden messages) is still unproven.
30 posted on
04/23/2012 8:09:31 AM PDT by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: Robert Drobot
I thought it said “fnord”.
Meanwhile back in reality every experiment with subliminal messages shows them to be not very effective and not worth the trouble.
33 posted on
04/23/2012 9:05:24 AM PDT by
discostu
(I did it 35 minutes ago)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson