Posted on 04/22/2012 1:38:48 AM PDT by Yosemitest
Edited on 04/22/2012 5:23:44 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
The following is an excerpt from Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President.
It's the "Introduction" from Pages xi thru xxiii .
Who is Barack Obama, and why is the American public forbidden from examining key documentation from his past?
Great read!
Well, almost everybody. Steve Malzberg USED to discuss the birth certificate question on his NYC WOR afternoon drive talk show until WOR DUMPED him. (At the time I believe Malzberg had higher ratings in NYC than Hannity did, which would mean he had the highest afternoon drive ratings of any radio program in the NYC Metro area.)
ML/NJ
ping obama bc etc
Not defending Rushbo because I've made the same comment many times ... however, there are other so called conservatives commentators (Hannity, for one) that won't go there either. If this story breaks and goes mainstream these so called conservative media types will be retiring, or doing something else, their credibility completely gone.
No marriage record has been found in the U.S. It seems to me that an idealistic, silly twit of a girl, like her, with all her idealistic, romantic notions of anthropology and primitive society would want to run away with her African warrior prince, aka African commie, and be married in a traditional African tribal ceremony. Then once she was faced with the reality of it, she was wife #2 and life in tribal Africa was not romantic or idealistic at all, she returned with her punishment, I mean baby, to the U.S. and filed for an official divorce to keep her “husband” from making any legal claims against her as his wife such as a claim to U.S. citizenship. Of course this is all conjecture on my part, yet where is that U.S. marriage certificate?
“Although the INS record does not name Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, the probability that there could have been another U.S. citizen mother giving birth to her child in that region including Kenya in the month of August 1961 and seeking the assistance of a U.S. Consular officer to obtain a certificate of citizenship are vanishingly small.”
Has anybody stepped forward to claim that this was a record of their child’s birth?
bookmark
Undocumented dog eater.
If you expect Rush Limbaugh to endanger his cushy lifestyle, you are naive at best. Rush maybe a doctor of democracy but he’s as much a coward in order to protect his wealth as anyone in media.
Good job!
B U M P
” The message should be clear: cover 0bama’s crimes now, hang with 0bama when justice is finally served.”
BUMP
” If you expect Rush Limbaugh to endanger his cushy lifestyle, you are naive at best. Rush maybe a doctor of democracy but he’s as much a coward in order to protect his wealth as anyone in media.”
Rush is already under assult every which way. We need politicians to stand up. So far, none have. Just Sheriff Joe. How about the Tea Party?
amazing how information on his eligibility is always shuffled into Chat
No. This does not fit Occam’s Razor nor common sense. A 17 year old pregnant girl doesn’t go to Africa to have her baby. Period.
Obama has citizenship issues, or he wouldnt have spent a lifetime using phony documents. The simplest response to that is found in the history. Stanley Ann was not seen in Hawaii during her pregnancy, but she showed up witha newborn she did not know how to care for in Seattle. In 1961 it was customary for a knocked up Seattle kid to go to a Vancouver home for unwed mothers. If Stanley Ann decided at the last minute to keep her baby, she would have been adrift really fast. That’s why she was in Seattle going to college with a newborn she didn’t know how to care for.
It is almost certain she did not travel to Kenya to have her child.
But it seems Barack was not a citizen and the Canadian explanation makes the most sense. The family never intended for her to come back with a child so they logically did not know or care that Stanley was not old enough to confer citizenship.
Yes all conservative talk show hosts should talk about Obama's dishonesty and other aspects of his abhorrent past. However most listeners already know.
But there are many more apolitical Americans listening to "nonpartisan" media than there are Americans who listen to and read conservative opinion --
apparently some objected to my opinion because my reply above was deleted.
IMO it is a mistake to ignore the problem ("it's borrrrrrrrring or whatever") because in a close election the apolitical voters will elect Obama.
I will repeat w/o naming the only "nonpartisan" program I know well enough to make comments.
IMO we must let "nonpartisan" media know it when they bash the right and virtually forbid criticism of Obama; or when they kowtow to left-wing MauMauing -- I have cited cases of that in past replies.
If the shows want to support Obama -- fine! Just don't let them get away with saying that they are "nonpartisan." That's all. Give the apolitical folks a clue.
Check one: __ scan __ scroll __ scold (no curse words please) __ scrub :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.