Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Criminal penalties for violating Executive Order 6102
The Numismatist ^

Posted on 04/10/2012 4:35:01 PM PDT by depressed in 06

The latest issue of The Numismatist has an article by Q. David Bowers, page 43, has a poster on Executive Order 6102, Roosevelt's confiscation of private gold, that has the following statement in it:

"CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF EXECUTI...$10,000 fine or 10 years imprisonment or both, provided by Section 9 of the order."


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS:
How does this Executive Order have criminal penalties?
1 posted on 04/10/2012 4:35:05 PM PDT by depressed in 06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

I thought EO’s only pertained to federal employees.


2 posted on 04/10/2012 4:52:16 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

Ironically, in terms of gold at today’s price a $10,000 fine is equivalent to $827,500 in modern money. FDR was a snake.


3 posted on 04/10/2012 4:55:04 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

A court ruled it invalid and a law was passed by Congrees that took affect on 12/31/1974 to allow citizens to own gold coins.


4 posted on 04/10/2012 4:57:59 PM PDT by Ecliptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ecliptic

I want some gold plated Titanium certificates. I’m sure Obama will draft some up before he departs.


5 posted on 04/10/2012 5:01:53 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

Try to enforce it.


6 posted on 04/10/2012 5:02:32 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I have lead for anyone who wants my gold or silver


7 posted on 04/10/2012 5:39:23 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (I like Obamacare because Granny signed the will and I need the cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

They did. It was ruled at the time that the order itself wasn’t valid, because it had the wrong signature on it. It was ruled that even though it had the wrong signature on it. There was no criminal conviction, but the gold was still surrendered and melted down. It was replaced early the next year by the Gold Reserve Act.


8 posted on 04/10/2012 7:40:38 PM PDT by benikrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
I thought EO’s only pertained to federal employees.

Yep. So do statutes and regulations.

Tis what is called "a problem."

9 posted on 04/11/2012 12:31:47 AM PDT by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson