Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2012 9:41:35 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I remember installing and configuring a phone voicemail system on an OS/2 system once back around 1993. That’s about it though, never had enough experience on it to rate it but it was fairly easy enough to navigate around in.


2 posted on 04/03/2012 9:45:38 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Problem with OS2 Warp IBM sales guys could not sell Ice to a man in Hell. Microsoft Sales guys could sell Ice in the Artic circle.


3 posted on 04/03/2012 9:51:38 AM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“... OS/2 was a much more stable, secure and reliable PC operating system than Windows....”

What wasn’t?

Gates was as much a computer guru as Obama is a constitutional guru.

And both are equally matched crooks.


4 posted on 04/03/2012 9:52:39 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The real tragedy of the era was VAX/VMS. It was the OS for DEC minicomputers and considered great. However, closed source. So it was eclipsed. DEC, the second largest computer company, withered and was sold to COMPAQ. I’m sure many DEC/VAX’s are still in operation, but DEC management never capitalized.

I wrote my first e-mail on a DEC/VAX in 1981.


5 posted on 04/03/2012 9:53:47 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I still have a copy that came on about 50 floppy disks.


6 posted on 04/03/2012 9:55:08 AM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I replaced Delta Airline’s OS/2 RPL servers and workstations with Windows NT.

As a young whipper snapper I stayed up late many nights rebuilding IBM OS/2 servers in the bowels of airport server rooms.

Circa 1998


8 posted on 04/03/2012 9:56:03 AM PDT by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Best OS, ever.....and the most poorly marketed.


10 posted on 04/03/2012 9:56:56 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Microchannel Bus................


12 posted on 04/03/2012 9:57:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I used to work for IBM. The reason I think OS/2(half an operating system-old joke) failed was IBM, in their infinite wisdom, made the OS/2 application development suite super expensive to buy. There was about a 3 year window in the late 90’s where they had MS whipped in the market place and blew it totally. The should have made the dev suit totally free ware.


13 posted on 04/03/2012 10:01:11 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yeah, I tried using OS/2, and OS/2 Warp, but got tired of no applications (None?, well, hardly any...and very expensive) for it. Had to keep buying Windows programs, and then run them in “emulation mode”, which wasn’t much better than using Windows in the first place.

Also, I wasn’t all that fond of having to partition off a huge chunk of the HD, and use dual booting, because there were some programs that refused to run in emulation mode.

Like Sony Beta-Max, it was MUCH better, but too much an orphan, thanks to rotten marketing & developer support...even Apple had more native aps & software than IBM could provide for OS/2.


16 posted on 04/03/2012 10:05:36 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The difference between "bad" & "worse" is more noticeable than that between "good" & "better")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

OS/2 was a true multitasking OS, vastly superior to Windows 3.1, which had no process protection. OS/2 had a Windows 3.1 compatibility mode that was more stable and reliable.

What killed OS/2 was IBM’s total indifference to developers and marketers. I wanted to write a device driver for OS/2, but IBM wanted something like $10,000 for the Device Driver Kit (DDK) and another $5K or so for the compiler.

In contrast, Microsoft gave away their Device Driver Kit (DDK) for free with a compiler thrown in. And they gave great marketing support including a hardware compatibility program that granted hardware vendors the right to use the Windows logo and artwork in ad copy to sell Windows compatible hardware.

So all the hardware vendors (including mine) turned their backs on OS/2 and embraced Windows. This despite the fact that by any technical measure OS/2 was the superior platform by far. OS/2 had a 100% compatible Win 3.1 subsystem (IBM cross-licensed their source code with Microsoft). So a device driver written for OS/2 would also support Win 3.1 apps.

If IBM’s management weren’t such idiots we would be running OS/8 today instead of Windows 8.


18 posted on 04/03/2012 10:08:28 AM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

All I know is that it had a little cat that chased the mouse pointer around.


23 posted on 04/03/2012 10:15:45 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Salo; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; stylin_geek; ...

25 posted on 04/03/2012 10:18:22 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Salo; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; stylin_geek; ...

26 posted on 04/03/2012 10:19:06 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
OS/2 turns 25 years old ( anyone remeber this Operating System?)

Yes, I remember OS/2. I ran it for about 5 years as my desktop OS.

28 posted on 04/03/2012 10:42:16 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I would've liked to have seen how things would've shaped up if Windows hadn't "won" the PC "desktop wars" and IBM's OS/2 had.

The byzantine structure of IBM along with the decades earlier consent decree, harmed the operating system. They couldn't even require their own PC division to support it.

It had many features in the early/mid-90s including voice dictation, video chat and movie creation that are taken for granted now yet were pioneering then. In many ways it forecast what was to come.

30 posted on 04/03/2012 10:56:25 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Newt says, "A nominee that depresses turnout won't beat Barack Obama.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Helped design a Worldwide Marketing system I/O by I/O using OS2 in 1991-93 It was slow so many Bugs I inadvertently sat next to Indonesian IBM GM on Plane and he said Operating systems was a Hardware Hog never Use it.. I wanted LINUX .We were forced by HQ Corporate System to use it we had to train Programmers as none existed in ASIA IBM flew in from Dallas Once a Month. We were literally debugging their own System..later abandoned 5 yrs later. That was our 1st foray away from IBM Mainframes..


33 posted on 04/03/2012 11:23:36 AM PDT by philly-d-kidder (AB-Sheen"The truth is the truth if nobody believes it,a lie is still a lie, everybody believes it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bill Gates used OS/2 to continue his game of rope-a-dope with IBM.


36 posted on 04/03/2012 11:34:38 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We were using a Banyan network(!), deploying Windows 3.1 onto PCs at the time... Surprisingly, OS/2 had good Banyan driver support; as an Admin I ran Win3.1 under Warp and it actually performed pretty well.

Then in the late 90’s, we went to Windows NT4 on the Desktop and Microsoft networking, and you know the rest of the story ;)


37 posted on 04/03/2012 11:37:45 AM PDT by mikrofon (PC Bump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I actually liked OS/2 a lot. Rexx was a really powerful scripting language. These days I’m happy using Linux, but I do think that ultimately it would have been better for consumers had OS/2 succeeded. Unfortunately, at the time, IBM could not market themselves out of a paper bag.


39 posted on 04/03/2012 12:27:23 PM PDT by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson