Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2012 12:29:06 PM PDT by BruceDeitrickPrice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BruceDeitrickPrice
A thousand years ago, the serfs worked in the fields and never learned how to read. The guys up in the castle liked it that way.
Two hundred years ago, the guys who owned the plantations didn't like it when the slaves learned to read. Frederick Douglass talked about that a lot.

Today, the government schools work hard to make sure that many people have no significant ability to read, and no love of learning.

It's by design.

2 posted on 03/30/2012 12:38:17 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Why go to all the trouble of this look-say crap when you can easily teach a kid to read by simply showing him the letters and telling him their sound equivalents? Start at three or four years old and by the time the kid is six, he’ll be reading anything, and doing it fluently. His reading ability will lead to increased comprehension and snowball into an impressive wealth of knowledge by the time the look-say kids are just getting over their struggles with Dick and Jane.


3 posted on 03/30/2012 1:08:44 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Some kids get past the sound it out stage so quickly it’s hard to know whether they ever went through it.

These kids can probably learn to read by these methods just fine.

But they would probably learn just fine without anybody actually teaching them. Personally I cannot remember not knowing how to read. My mom has a picture of me at three totally absorbed in a book, and not a picture book.

The problem is the kids that need phonics to learn how to read properly. And they don’t get it.


8 posted on 03/30/2012 2:24:39 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
The "Whole Word" movement was started by a guy who had observed that adults didn't "sound out" each word as they read -- they had them memorized. He then made the leap of logic that children, therefore, should skip the sounding out stage and just learn the words on sight.

What apparently didn't occur to him was that after sounding out a word three or four times, it is memorized (automatized might be more precise.) And, thus, an academic pinhead created the system that has condemned millions of people to poor reading.

To skip the memorization of about 41 sound/letter combinations, these geniuses proposed memorizing the entire language. And most of the education establishment fell right in line behind them.

9 posted on 03/30/2012 2:37:38 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

John Dewey and his circle of followers will be regarded by future historians as evil men.


10 posted on 03/30/2012 2:40:02 PM PDT by Liberty Wins (Newt --named after Isaac Newton?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Not unlike the Chinese language where the symbols represent entire words and not combinations of more atomic characters.


12 posted on 03/30/2012 2:53:53 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Bump for later Saturday reading.


15 posted on 03/30/2012 9:37:57 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson