Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/26/2012 7:47:04 PM PST by OUTKAST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: OUTKAST

For those of us who don’t have the time sit through the whole video, does anyone know what happened? There are no headlined on Drudge, google or Yahoo, so I assume nothing happened.


2 posted on 01/26/2012 7:52:55 PM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OUTKAST

Good video, terrible title.

This is not a “Birther” victory.

This is a “Eligibility” victory due to BHO, Jr. not being a Natural Born Citizen as required by the Constitution.

It has nothing to do with where he was born, and we still do not know where that is.

It is a victory driven by his terminal arrogance. When the default judgement is actually signed I will breath a sigh of relief.


9 posted on 01/26/2012 8:27:20 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OUTKAST

At long last a little sanity is on display in Georgia! Finally introducd into evidence is this snippet:

“His father’s citizenship, they said, precludes him from serving as president, since the Founders required that officer to be a “natural-born citizen,” not just a “citizen.”

The term is not defined in the Constitution, but evidence introduced included a passage from a 1875 Supreme Court opinion that states:”The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

Weldon explained in his presentation that the 14th Amendment granting citizenship did not redefine Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which includes the requirement for a president to be a “natural-born citizen.”
The attorney argued also that another later court case referenced citizenship in the dicta, not the central holding in the case, and thus was not controlling.

************************************************************

This is what the term “natural-born” actually means - “natural-born” is a concept of natural law borrowed from the British that stipulates that, in order for someone to be a natural-born citizen, their parents determine their actual citizenship status. Under the terms of the law, 60% of an individual’s citizenship comes from the citizenhip of the father, with the remainder coming from the mother’s citizenship.

In Obama’s case, then, he was not eligible to be POTUS because, although his mother was American, his father was Kenyan. The place of his birth (alledgedly Hawaii), is immaterial in this case because he is not, according to the definition, a “natural-born” citizen as required by the 14th Amendment!!


10 posted on 01/26/2012 8:41:37 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OUTKAST

.

Canada Free Press:

(snip)

Who will save Freedom?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.

“...Orly Taitz, who has made defending the Constitution and the American way of life a personal ambition, in the absence of any constitutional leadership.”

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

.


11 posted on 01/26/2012 8:41:56 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!Ho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OUTKAST

bttt


13 posted on 01/26/2012 8:48:52 PM PST by TEXOKIE (... and HAPPY NEW YEAR to all FREEPERS EVERYWHERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OUTKAST

sfl


26 posted on 01/27/2012 6:11:56 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson