I completely disagree with you about Drudge. Sorry but every single hit piece article has been about Newt, not Romney.
Wonder why this isn’t getting play on Drudge?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837589/posts
Maybe because it is a hit on Mitt and not Newt... If this article is true, it is simply the biggest moment of the entire primaries yet Drudge conveniently ignores it, while highlighting attacks by Pelosi and Rubio on Newt.
As far as Winston Churchill goes, I’ll stick with my characterization of Newt being Churchillian compare to the POS Mitt Romney.
He links today to a story about Rubio saying something against Newt. Exactly how is this a predilection for a story that specifically targets Newt. Rubio, for all intents and purposes, has been the darling of Free Republic in many respects. I’m sorry, I still don’t buy your dissatisfaction with bad Newt News as intentional Drudge manuevering.
As for the Churchill thing, I liken any comparison, even loosely connected ones, as equivalent to Obama’s self-assessment that he’s Lincoln, FDR, Teddy, and Reagan all-in-one. Best thing to do is stand on your own merits, not invite discourse over still-ludicrous comparison.