He links today to a story about Rubio saying something against Newt. Exactly how is this a predilection for a story that specifically targets Newt. Rubio, for all intents and purposes, has been the darling of Free Republic in many respects. I’m sorry, I still don’t buy your dissatisfaction with bad Newt News as intentional Drudge manuevering.
As for the Churchill thing, I liken any comparison, even loosely connected ones, as equivalent to Obama’s self-assessment that he’s Lincoln, FDR, Teddy, and Reagan all-in-one. Best thing to do is stand on your own merits, not invite discourse over still-ludicrous comparison.
Comparing Newt to Romney is pretty much akin to comparing him to Obama. In both cases, Newt is Churchillian by comparison.
Did you read the thread I linked to you? What if the hell would that article not be a headline on Drudge?
I, like many other freepers, see what Drudge is doing. If you want to ignore it go ahead but Drudge’s actions are no different than those of Beck and Coulter.