Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; Fantasywriter; AmericanVictory; Springfield Reformer; rolling_stone; STARWISE; ...
How GA's admimistrative judge will play out is anyone's guess.

So far, all the games are being played out on Birth Certificate Field, so it all depends upon whether or not the Administrative Judge wants to bring it back to "Natural Born Citizen."

Team Obama is successfully holding to the position that :
(a) He is a Natural Born Citizen
(b) That's because he says he was born of an American Mother in Hawaii
(c) and that is proven by this document that Team Obama chooses to present, no matter how suspicious they may appear to be.
(d)Take it or leave it, or take us to court, whence ye shall be laughed out onto the streets.

Sheriff Joe has seen through the obvious ruse. (As have all of us.) It is painfully evident by now that there is either (1) no actual birth certificate on file, or
(2) What is on the mysterious document is to remain secret.

Ring-Ring. "Hello, Hawaii! Would you be so kind as to fax me a certified copy of the President's Birth Certificate? Hello? Hello? No. No. Not an abstract of the data you have on file. A copy of the actual Birth Certificate.... yea, you know, like a regular BIRTH CERTIFICATE?"

73 posted on 01/16/2012 4:01:30 PM PST by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Kenny Bunk

When Sheriff Joe makes that call, can Hawaii lawfully tell him no? That’s my question. If he asks to audit their complete vital records history for Obama - both computer records (complete with transaction logs, which is the only way to know what’s really happened to that electronic record) and paper records - can they lawfully refuse?

If he were to charge the HDOH and Obama both with forgery, perjury or misprision of forgery, and conspiracy to defraud the people of Arizona through perjurious election filings ... would he be able to subpoena the records and depose the witnesses to prove the crimes that were committed? Or would he be told that only Hawaii law enforcement or AG Holder’s feds can have access to the records that would prove the guilt or innocence of the accused?

That’s what I really, really want to know. Because if Hawaii officials can hide those records forever, then the United States has no way to protect itself from a STATE that is an enemy combatant. Harsh words, I know, but I can’t think of any clearer way to describe the situation in which we find ourselves.


74 posted on 01/16/2012 4:13:56 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

That is an interesting post and a very good summary. Thanks for the ping.


79 posted on 01/16/2012 5:02:16 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson