When Sheriff Joe makes that call, can Hawaii lawfully tell him no? That’s my question. If he asks to audit their complete vital records history for Obama - both computer records (complete with transaction logs, which is the only way to know what’s really happened to that electronic record) and paper records - can they lawfully refuse?
If he were to charge the HDOH and Obama both with forgery, perjury or misprision of forgery, and conspiracy to defraud the people of Arizona through perjurious election filings ... would he be able to subpoena the records and depose the witnesses to prove the crimes that were committed? Or would he be told that only Hawaii law enforcement or AG Holder’s feds can have access to the records that would prove the guilt or innocence of the accused?
That’s what I really, really want to know. Because if Hawaii officials can hide those records forever, then the United States has no way to protect itself from a STATE that is an enemy combatant. Harsh words, I know, but I can’t think of any clearer way to describe the situation in which we find ourselves.
Absolutely. Hawaii can always claim that they have already done so. And it doesn't make any difference.
However if Sheriff Joe and Boys from AZ play their cards right, they would use NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN as their stated reason for keeping him off their ballot.
It would then be Team Obama that must bring suit to be restored to the state ballot, not vice versa. Team Obama becomes the Plaintiff. It is then the Plaintiff's job to not only provide the Hawaii Birth Records, but more important to show how he fits the constitutional requirement for a "Natural Born Citizen.