Anyone could go brain-dead trying to follow these cases; I’ve pretty much stopped.
BUT... my very simple point is that so far there has been no need for a subpoena by anyone in any court for the GA state administrative hearings court case.
Judge Malihi hasn’t ordered any records yet. We don’t know what records he would require, and won’t until the hearing. Taitz isn’t free to proceed as if she were granted discovery; she wasn’t.
This judge will decide what documents he believes will satisfy GA law, and demand of the defendant, the candidate, that he produce those records. Just politically, imagine if Obama didn’t comply with the GA court demand and was kept off that state’s ballot because he refused to produce those documents.
I understand that people despise lawyers, and I can be counted among them, generally speaking. Again, BUT there’s a reason experienced lawyers are usually paid big bucks to prosecute or defend lawsuits. The law, and court rules and procedures, are very complicated and require the specialized training that lawyers go through. They can miss one deadline or be off on what seems a minor point and their case can be kicked out of court. Leaving that work to non-professionals is to court disaster.
My fear is that Malihi will accept a forged document without even giving it scrutiny, and the issue will be deemed as decided.
We’ve been betrayed by the judges too many times, so when somebody does what seems to be right it’s like the mischievous kid smiling; you wonder what he’s up to. Kenny, you suggested right away that it could be a ploy, and I followed up by saying it could specifically be intended to pre-empt whatever the Cold Case Posse comes up with.
I’ve said since about last January that I thought Abercrombie made his gung-ho statements about showing Obama’s BC because they were planning to unveil a forged one. And I said at that time that with the HDOH caught in so much law-breaking, alteration of records, lying, etc the only way we will have a trustworthy understanding of what really happened is to cross-examine all the records - computer transaction logs, etc. If this judge doesn’t demand that, and/or the microfilms as well as other records that very strongly look to be tampered with, Obama will be able to argue that his eligibility and the genuineness of the documents have already been legally proven.
Kenny, I think you said that Obama never claimed that what he posted online was his actual birth certificate. So if the HDOH comes out with a good forgery Obama could still evade forgery charges on a technicality. It is not legally certified even if the vestiges of a “seal” are considered, and I don’t believe for a minute that what he posted online is what the HDOH has in their office. They have in their office a much better forgery, and a judge looking at it for a brief moment could easily be fooled - especially if he doesn’t already know all the crap surrounding Sunahara’s birth record and other crimes the HDOH has committed surrounding Obama’s records.
So far confirmed witnesses for January 26 trial against Obama in Atlanta GA. Per Orly:
1. Felicito Papa
2. Douglas Vogt
3. Susan Daniels
4. Dr. Ron Polland
5. Linda Jordan
6. Chris Strunk
7. I will attest on my search in the Selective Service records
8. Plaintiffs David Farrar and Cody Robert Judy
9. I asked another attorney with over 20 years of experience to be there in case I need any additional help. I will pay for his expenses and time.
10. One or two TV reporters told me, they will apply for permits to record the proceedings