All contributions are for the Current Quarter Expenses.
Donate Today!
Posted on 01/07/2012 8:40:35 AM PST by To-Whose-Benefit?
A man who was on the American Independent Party’s presidential ticket in California in 2008 as well as a certified elector for the party have asked a full panel of a federal appeals court to hear their claim that Barack Obama wasn’t qualified to be president, stacking the election unfairly against qualified candidates.
In the case, that a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently determined that election fraud suspected in the campaign essentially became moot when Obama was inaugurated.
The lawsuit was filed on the day of Obama’s inauguration. Obama flubbed the oath of office, and the White House reported he retook it in private later.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Obama:
College grades sealed; SAT scores sealed; passport records sealed; senior thesis, not available; actual copy of his birth certificate, not available; social security number issued in ‘77 in Connecticut, a state he’d never been to; college admission records, sealed.
And our “press” is looking into Santorum’s dead child.
Ahh the amazing wisdom found within the 9th Circus!
That child has one thing zero hasn't. A birth certificate for one. Loving parents,that's two.
zero remains a Zero!
Wonder what country his handlers China or Russia?.NO republican could ever get away with such a trick and get into office.
The media must very proud now.
We must demand that Congress and the press look into the Kenyan’s background.
DEMAND IT!
Working on it,remind congress it’s an election event that will change their life.
The birth certificate is a misdirection. In America, anyone can with determination can get a state based BC. Even the foreign children of working diplomats born in the U.S. are receiving BC’s and SSN(s).
http://www.cis.org/birthright-citizenship-diplomats
Birthright Citizenship for Children of Foreign Diplomats?
Limiting Language in the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause Has No Practical Effect
By Jon Feere
July 2011
The intended scope of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause has been hotly debated in the context of children born to illegal immigrants. While it appears unlikely that the intent of those who authored the 14th Amendment was to ensure automatic citizenship for children born to illegal and temporary immigrants, some argue that the amendment protects such grants of citizenship.
Amid this debate, however, there is one area of solid agreement among advocates on all sides of the debate: In the least, children born to foreign diplomats are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are therefore not to be granted U.S. citizenship.
But even that low standard is not being met.
A lack of direction from Congress has resulted in children born to foreign diplomats on U.S. soil receiving U.S. birth certificates and Social Security numbers (SSNs) — effectively becoming U.S. citizens — despite the limiting language within the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Among the findings:
Despite Congress’s clear intent to not create a completely universal and automatic birthright citizenship policy, the current application of the Citizenship Clause is so lax that the United States has a de facto universal birthright citizenship policy that denies U.S. citizenship by birth to no one.
There is no federal requirement that hospitals ask new parents if they are foreign diplomatic staff. State agencies do not instruct hospitals to differentiate between children born to diplomatic staff and those born to U.S. citizens or temporary or illegal aliens. Hospitals issue the same birth certificates to all newborns.
The only way to prove Obama is ineligible is to locate his Certificate of Nationality on file with the USCIS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.