Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farrar Motion to dismiss by Obama is denied
3Jan2012 | MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge

Posted on 01/03/2012 10:17:53 AM PST by Elderberry

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

On December 15, 2011, Defendant, President Barack Obama, moved for dismissal of Plaintiffs' challenge to his qualifications for office. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this contested case pursuant to Chapter 13 of Title 50, the "Georgia Administrative Procedure Act."

For the reasons indicated below, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 1

I. Discussion 1. The Georgia Election Code (the "Code") mandates that "[e]very candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought." O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(a).

2. Both the Secretary of State and the electors of Georgia are granted the authority under the Code to challenge the qualifications of a candidate. The challenge procedures are defined in Code Section 21-2-5(b), which authorizes any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate to challenge the qualifications of the candidate by filing a written complaint with the Secretary of State within two weeks after the deadline for qualifying. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b).

3. The Georgia law governing presidential preference primaries mandates that "[o]n a date set by the Secretary of State . . . the state executive committee of each party which is to conduct a presidential preference primary shall submit to the Secretary of State a list of the names of the candidates of such party to appear on the presidential preference primary ballot." O.C.G.A. § 21- 2-193. On October 6, 2011, Secretary Kemp issued a notice to the chairman of each political

1 Because Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied, in the interest of efficiency, the Court finds it unnecessary to wait for the Plaintiffs' responses before denying the motion.

Page 2 of 4

  party to notify them that the deadline for submitting the list of candidate names for the 2012 presidential preference primary was November 15, 2011. On November 1, 2011, the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party submitted President Barack Obama's name as the sole candidate for the Democratic Party. To be timely, complaints challenging a presidential candidate's qualifications in the presidential preference primary had to be filed no later than November 29, 2011. Plaintiffs, as electors eligible to vote for Defendant, timely filed challenges with the Secretary of State before the deadline of November 29, 2011.

4. In the instant motion, Defendant contends that Georgia law does not give Plaintiffs authority to challenge a political party's nominee for president in a presidential preference primary because Code Section 21-2-5 does not apply to the presidential preference primary.

5. Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this Court finds that the cases cited by Defendant are not controlling. When the Court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the "first step . . . is to examine the plain statutory language." Morrison v. Claborn, 294 Ga. App. 508, 512 (2008). "Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden. In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given their ordinary and everyday meaning." Six Flags Over Ga. v. Kull, 276 Ga. 210, 211 (2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Because there is no other "natural and reasonable construction" of the statutory language, this Court is "not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning." Blum v. Schrader, 281 Ga. 238, 240 (2006) (quotation marks omitted).

6. Code Section 21-2-5(a) states that "every candidate for federal and state office" must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this Court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary.

O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a) (emphasis added). Although the word "candidate" is not explicitly defined in the Code, Section 21-2-193 states that the political party for the presidential preference Page 3 of 4

  primary "shall submit to the Secretary of State a list of the names of the candidates of such party to appear on the presidential preference primary ballot." O.C.G.A. 21-2-193 (emphasis added). Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office.

7. Code Sections 21-2-190 to 21-2-200 set out the procedures of the presidential preference primary and also provide no exception to the Section 21-2-5 qualification requirement. This Court finds no basis under Georgia law why the qualification requirements in Section 21-2-5 would not apply to a candidate for the office of the president in the presidential preference primary.

8. Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.

II. Decision Based on the foregoing, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.

SO ORDERED, this the 3 rd day of January, 2012.

MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge

Page 4 of 4


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last
To: Elderberry; hoosiermama; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Farrar Motion to dismiss by 0hbama is denied

Thanks hoosiermama.

21 posted on 01/03/2012 11:08:38 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maineman

“Wasn’t something going to take place in N.H. today? Regarding BHO eligibility. I can’t find anything.”

I remember hearing that a number of their representatives were to hold a press conference. Maybe that was it.


22 posted on 01/03/2012 11:12:26 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry; hoosiermama

http://www.scribd.com/doc/77037624/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-v-Obama-Motion-to-Sever-Granted-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-1-3-2012

http://www.scribd.com/doc/77037880/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-v-Obama-Motion-to-Take-Depositions-Denied-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-1-3-2012


23 posted on 01/03/2012 11:12:52 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Great work maggie ;)


24 posted on 01/03/2012 11:19:06 AM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Exactly.. we’ve been through similar stuff in the last 3 years with judges that gave us hope :/

Keep our fingers crossed and don’t stop praying..


25 posted on 01/03/2012 11:21:37 AM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Oh boy. I wish....


26 posted on 01/03/2012 11:21:53 AM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry; LucyT; Kenny Bunk; melancholy; DiogenesLamp; chrisnj

Thank you Elderberry and LucyT!!

This tells of the second step in what could be only a handful of important steps in the right direction.


27 posted on 01/03/2012 11:25:37 AM PST by frog in a pot (I am not a birther...I am an NBCer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Click the Flames

Your Conservative Source of News and Information

Abolish FReepathons
Donate Monthly
Sponsors will contribute $10 for each New Monthly Donor

28 posted on 01/03/2012 11:42:26 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bgill

This decision is clear, concise, and leaves no room misconstruction; and leaves any appellate court with legal option to reverse. The GA statute gives electors standing, so the burden shifts to Obama to prove his eligibility.


29 posted on 01/03/2012 11:58:26 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Make that leaves an appellate court with no legal option to reverse.


30 posted on 01/03/2012 12:00:48 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]





I May Be a Birdbrain
But Smart FReepers Donate Monthly
To Abolish FReepathons



31 posted on 01/03/2012 12:09:02 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
Justice delayed is Justice denied! Here we are going up for RE-ELECTION and not one Honest Judge in the land can rule on the obvious fraud of this pretender in chief applying for the job in the first place. THREE YEARS of bribe taking and mafia justice in place of rule of law.

It's all smoke and mirrors at this point, a total slap in the face of all Americans. Justice and Law in the United States is a joke, ludicrous, beyond laughing, a joke so ridiculous its not funny, its sad. They have changed a free country with hope into a Banana Republic of obvious scofflaws.

Obama makes me glad there is a Hell.

32 posted on 01/03/2012 12:09:02 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic

Patience, it will appear. Last week they had a story on Mark Hatfield’s action. The bamster is going to have to show his bona fides in GA, sweet!


33 posted on 01/03/2012 12:21:59 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
so the burden shifts to Obama to prove his eligibility.

So all he's gotta do is show his birth certificate....I mean come on he has at least TWO!
34 posted on 01/03/2012 12:25:50 PM PST by freebird5850 (Of course Obama loves his country...it's just that Newt loves mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; hoosiermama

thanks LucyT & Hoosiermama


35 posted on 01/03/2012 12:36:36 PM PST by urtax$@work (The only kind of memorial is a Burning memorial !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

This is what should be next:

“...the Secretary of State shall notify the candidate in writing that his or her qualifications are being challenged and the reasons therefor and shall advise the candidate that he or she is requesting a hearing on the matter before an administrative law judge of the Office of State Administrative Hearings pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 13 of Title 50 and shall inform the candidate of the date, time, and place of the hearing when such information becomes available. The administrative law judge shall report his or her findings to the Secretary of State. (c) The Secretary of State shall determine if the candidate is qualified to seek and hold the public office for which such candidate is offering. If the Secretary of State determines that the candidate is not qualified, the Secretary of State shall withhold the name of the candidate from the ballot or strike such candidate´s name from the ballot if the ballots have been printed. ...”

Above is from here (hopefully Justia has not altered the code):

http://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2006/21/21-2-5.html

This is the scenario every SoS was hoping to avoid. The Georgia SoS tried to put it back on the national party. Not unlike how Brian Schatz in Hawaii did in 2008 by filling out an incomplete (and hence legally worthless) form and having Pelosi submit another form with the legally required language. This judge did not let the SoS off the hook. The SoS now HAS to deal with this challenge at a state level. In writing, the SoS must notify the candidate they are now under challenge and it will go in front of an administrative law judge.

Remember - all elections are state elections. States control who and who is not on the state level ballot - even for federal office.


36 posted on 01/03/2012 12:41:00 PM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

Thanks for the ping!


37 posted on 01/03/2012 12:42:44 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freebird5850

Maybe they will just print this off and submit it:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate.pdf

Complete with the snopes message board URL on the bottom...


38 posted on 01/03/2012 12:46:05 PM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Court: Obama must be ‘constitutionally’ eligible

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/


39 posted on 01/03/2012 12:48:03 PM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

Thank you very much. I love news that is promising and a court room full of Obama sweat and panic sounds very promising in this case.


40 posted on 01/03/2012 12:56:26 PM PST by RitaOK (The higher you poll in Iowa, the more embarrassing it is for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson