Ron Paul is a Jew-hating, American-hating bigot.
Is this satire?
Not Breaking News, Paultard.
RE: I’ve been on this site for what I consider a long time, and I’ve never been pounced on like this for what I consider a rather tame posting.
Well here’s a clue for you. Make a post supporting a liberal or a Jew-hating, American-hating, mentally unstable lunatic and you just might be an idiot worthy of public flogging.
On the historical facts he is correct but on everything else he’s wrong. For the same reason the British and the French should be the ones to clean up the middle east, as they caused the problem to begin with after WW1.
I only ask for a title that makes sense. RP = nuke winter, not because he’s a warmonger, but clueless.
Paul has mostly excellent positions. I’d bet 70%. Where he screws the pooch, is related to the 12’vers, and international capital flows. The fact that people don’t understand MAD, and why it does not apply to Iran, most likely N. Korea, many of the splinter states of china(near future) and parts of south america does not make it less scary.
Santorum has a better economic, and f-policy then the rest, he’s not electable. VP or Sec state, to another run-maybe.
He still nuts no matter how you want to look at it.
” Ron Paul brilliantly articulating the failed strageties of the past and contrasting the way we are currently dealing with our enemies as opposed to the much more powerful, nuclear armed ones of the past.”
That’s my problem with Paul. He needs to articulate what his policie would be in the future besides saying “well, we had that coming. “ I don’t care how we got here, I care about where we’re going. I don’t agree with Paul that a nuclear Iran is not a threat. RonPaul would make Obama’s foreign policy look coherent.
You are insane.
Just when you start liking Pat Paulson he goes and opens his mouth to ruin it.
Happy New Year
1) The NIE released during the Bush years that he was apparently talking about is now recognized as politicized garbage written by a couple of leftists to prevent Bush from taking action against Iran. Everyone recognizes that they are going to have nukes very soon. The fact that he's still referring to the "study" is revealing.
That NIE report is contradicted by the recent International Atomic Energy Agency report saying that Iran is building nukes.
Also why does he believe the CIA or whatever? Aren't they the bad guys according to Paultards?
2) After erroneously saying they aren't getting nukes he then goes on to talk about how it's no big deal if they get nukes. Huh?
Not that any of the above means anything to you.
The nutcases coming to power in 1979 was not inevitable. Jimmah deliberately let the Ayatollah Khomeini come to power.
His "brilliant" point that "destroyed" Santorum was the 1953 coup I guess. I actually agree with him that the coup in 1953 should not have happened, but it has no relevance whatsoever to today's situation as far as what Iran is or isn't going to do with nukes. That question is completely irrelevant to Paul and his nutty followers apparently.
There is nothing I repeat nothing brilliant about Ron Paul! He has zero Change of becoming the Republican Nominee. If he did Obama would surely be re-elected cause Ron Paul is to the left Of Obama!
Ron Paul endorsed Cynthia McKinney?
OK? That should be enough. But let’s pretend Paul was around during Iran round one, when Almost-got-a-job was busy kidnapping US citizens, and Jimmah Cahtah was prezdent (McKinney LUUVS Cahtah, btw).
Paul would say— “these people didn’t ask us to come into their backyard and they are reacting JUST like we would if the chinese setup camp in TX , it’s no wonder they are kidnapping our people, look what we did putting the Shah in office”— really, just how bright is that? The FACT is the iranians, when they have a nuke will bring it to the US.
Paul agrees with obama, who is only too glad to have Israel wiped out, ME oil go to 250 a barrel, and all of us forced into bicycling. And there you have it- a mental disconnect, borne on the wings of a deep seated prejudice having more to do with world bankers than US sovereignty— no matter how he argues that it doesn’t— it does. In that sense the policy position is exactly that of David Duke.
I just got home from grcery shopping and want to see if you got banned or just zotted.