Posted on 12/18/2011 6:42:56 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
In today’s (12/20) installment of his series on Pearl Harbor Hanson W. Baldwin identifies as a question for the newly formed investigating board how the Japanese fleet got so close to Hawaii without being detected. Baldwin assumes there was a dawn to dusk, 360 degree air patrol covering all approaches to the islands. He figures the Japanese either got lucky with bad weather or else used some form of trickery. It does not occur to him that there was virtually no air recon.
I requested details of you in Homer's thread JAPANESE FORCES WIPED OUT IN WESTERN LUZON; MIDWAY, WAKE RESIST; 3 ITALIAN CRUISERS SUNK (12/14/41) but you have not yet replied to that thread so, I will ask again. What first hand participants who were in the Philippine area in 1941/42 agree with your assessment of MacArthur? Given the way SHTF in the Philippines and the natural tendency to point fingers, if you are correct, it should not be difficult to produce a substantial list of ranking officers who were in the Philippines that support your position.
The moon was full on Dec 3, 1941 meaning on the night of 12/6-12/7, there would still be quite a bit of moonlight in whose reflection an approaching fleet would clearly stand out from considerable distance.
http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/moonphases.html?year=1941&n=103
The argument in defense of Short and Kimmel on this goes as follows:
And of course, they never received such data.
In recent years, some have pointed to an alleged confusion in the state of alert reported by Short to Washington.
Supposedly, Short's intended report of the lowest state of alert -- defense against sabotage -- was interpreted in Washington as his highest state of alert, meaning full-fledged war footing.
I've seen those allegations, but the actual evidence shows Short reporting exactly what he did -- alert against sabotage.
I understand your point, I just posted the photo as an example of long range maritime patrol aircraft being available at Pearl Harbor contrary to what had previously been posted.
Iirc, CougarGA7 did once post a report highlighting MacArthur's inexplicable actions the morning Japanese destroyed his air forces on the ground.
From such reports CougarGA7 and others conclude that MacArthur should have been relieved, just as Short was in Hawaii.
It seems to me there is an interesting comparison between MacArthur and Short.
I think both were Old-Army infantry men, representing institutional disdain for the new air force prima donnas and their useless flying contraptions.
Both saw the "real war" as what infantrymen do, on the ground, after the fly-boys had conviently lost their expensive equipment, and could be redeployed as, yes!, more infantrymen.
Short at least had reasonable sounding excuses for why his planes were not in the air.
MacArthur had none, and yet, there they were, just like Short's, sitting ducks waiting for the Japanese to increase the commanders' real fighting force of infantry men.
Of course, that's just my opinion, doubt if we'll ever really know what those people were thinking.
Iirc, CougarGA7 did once post a report highlighting MacArthur's inexplicable actions the morning Japanese destroyed his air forces on the ground. From such reports CougarGA7 and others conclude that MacArthur should have been relieved, just as Short was in Hawaii.
Short at least had reasonable sounding excuses for why his planes were not in the air. MacArthur had none, and yet, there they were, just like Short's, sitting ducks waiting for the Japanese to increase the commanders' real fighting force of infantry men. Of course, that's just my opinion, doubt if we'll ever really know what those people were thinking.
I will address your belief about MacArthur on Dec 8 but not in this post since I'm on holiday schedule. Hopefully tonight or tomorrow I can get to it as a general post concerning popular belief about MacArthur on Dec 8 versus first hand accounts of what actually happened on Dec 8 in the Philippines. It won't be a large or comprehensive post but I just need a little time to sit down and pull citations from first hand accounts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.