You must be confused, but then again, that's hardly a surprise.
"Read the true account of what happened for yourself, since you seem to have such a fixation on it..."
Better yet, here's my posting history at FR:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:joe6pack/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Why don't you read through it and tell me what I said that makes you believe I have some type of fixation on it?
I may make the odd comment in regards to Newt's infidelities from time to time when it applies. For example on this thread you posed a (cheap shot) hypothetical as to why the Gingrich campaign had yet to respond to the challenge. I simply posed a hypothetical of my own in response.
Thanks again for bumping the thread. A lot more people are going to read about Santorum's challenge through your efforts :-)
Conservative talk radio will be all over this the next few days. The Grinch will have to respond one way or another.
Conservative talk radio will deliver the Grinch’s response to tens of millions of listeners across the country.
“Thanks again for bumping the thread. A lot more people are going to read about Santorum’s challenge through your efforts”
Shit, you should have just said so. Let me help you out more then. Fearless .01% challengers ALWAYS want a debate. Hahahaha. That oughta be a real squeaker, too, huh? Mr. Charisma should KO Newt in the first round. How many pings would you like?
You think that is something that Newt wouldn’t WANT promoted?
Hahahahaha. Have another sixer, Joe.