Posted on 12/01/2011 3:08:07 PM PST by traumer
A Bible school teacher is facing up to five years in jail after being accused of having sex with a 13-year-old boy. Heather Daughdrill, 28, of Westlake, Louisiana, is alleged to have begun the affair with the teen after meeting him at a summer Bible school camp. She is alleged to have checked the boy out of school without parental permission and taken him to her home where they had sex.
Investigators discovered several sexually explicit text messages that had been sent by Daughdrill to the boy.
The alleged relationship went on from June until October of this year.
Daughdrill, now out on bond, would allegedly pick the boy up from school without his parents knowledge for their liaisons Police began investigating Daughdrill after receiving a tip off earlier this month that she was involved in an inappropriate relationship with the underage boy.
They discovered Daughdrill had met the teenager at a summer Bible school camp where she was one of the adult teachers. Daughdrill was first booked into the Calcasieu Correctional Center on four counts of carnal knowledge of a juvenile, eight counts of sexual battery, three counts of 2nd degree kidnapping, contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behaviour with a juvenile.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Not guilty.
If you are interested in reading more comments:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2814824/posts
Ah to be thirteen again....
Dupe Post
Be fruitful and multiply.
Based on that photo, she’s definitely not guilty of anything.
Except looking good.
Female protestant pedophiles are perfectly OK.
There's absolutely nothing whatsoever: nothing moral, nothing ethical, nothing legal, wrong with a female using a boy to gratify her own lusts.
It’s ok they were doing it Missionary style
Gz !
Children are not safe from preditors anywhere these days, school, boy/girl scouts, church or with almost any adult. Damn shame.
Let her wear that prison orange for the next twenty years.
Change “Heather Daughdrill” to “Jerry Sandusky” and no one would think this was remotely amusing.
****************
I’ve seen Jerry’s picture. He’s definitely guilty.
But the tone of your post is surprisingly sarcastic.
Only perverts think this amusing as it is.
Does the kid have herpes now?
HPV?
Gonorrhea?
Any of the other STDs?
And while asking questions...how about these:
What is the increased likelihood that he will be unable to function in a lasting marriage now?
That he will become an addict?
That he will drink his liver away?
That he will wind up in prostitution, porn work, or a male stripper?
Anyone cracking a long streams of jokes on these threads ever examine the statistical data on these questions at all?
Me????
No ... don't you think every good father should go out of his way to find a 28 year old pedophile to satisfy her lusts on his son?
Really ... it's such a wonderful experience for the boy ... it shouldn't be left to chance.
Does that make you “over paid, over sexed, and over there?”-)
Yeah, we at freerepublic only take a stand against sin and immorality when perpetrated by homosexuals. If it involves attractive women we cheer it on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.