It's a sickening and sad state of affairs,but we can either shake our heads ruefully or try and do something. The beauty of my proposal is that the onus is on the person coming in for aid-they can either accept the contract,or,if they find it too stringent and oppressive,well,then,just don't sign it.They can either make the choice to not lay up in bed and push out litters of babies year in and year out or they can just keep going the way they are,but not on the taxpayers' back.
This ENDS the perpetual merry-go-round of welfare-ism generation after generation,helps to break the cycle of dependence,creates jobs state by state and will in the long run save taxpayers millions.Taking it out of federal government hands and having it administered strictly by the states will also reduce the likelihood of zero oversight.
Who knows? We may get welfare back to what it was originally intended to be-a hand up to help an unfortunate family get through a rough patch and emerge as a productive member of the workforce.
AMEN,AMEN,AMEN AND A THOUSAND AMENS to what you say there.
Let's get busy. I am sick and tired of these perpetual merry go round baby factories.
OH, I got some more to add, possibly, pass it by you.
I want to see these welfare MOMs held responsible for the attendance of their children to school, and for their grades.
So, I propose that if the child is truant, or if the child does not make at least a Cee, DOCK THEIR WELFARE assistance by a certain amount.
They breed, drop the kid and turn them loose in the streets to steal, plummet and terrorize/vandalize the neighborhoods.
Any thoughts on adding something like that in that contract?