Skip to comments.
Column: Lawsuits could end Occupy nuisance
USA Today, DavidRivkin.com ^
| 11/30/2011
| David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey
Posted on 11/30/2011 8:34:39 AM PST by american_steve
They are not what democracy looks like and are looking less and less like a serious protest movement. Nevertheless, much can be learned from the Occupy Wall Street crowd's protracted seizure of New York's private Zuccotti Park, similar unlawful tactics around the country and the much delayed official response. The most important lesson is that when government fails to do its duty in a timely manner, ordinary citizens must consider using existing laws to protect themselves from unruly Occupiers.
The park protesters have been camping out in the urban environment, unsuitable for such activities. They have created sanitary problems and noise pollution by beating drums and other instruments. Crime has shot up in and around the park, including rapes and physical assaults. Police officers have been injured in confrontations with protesters problems that are not limited to Occupy protests in New York City. Yet, for weeks, public officials afraid of being labeled as hostile to the First Amendment have gone to great lengths to avoid confrontation with the protesters.
(Excerpt) Read more at davidrivkin.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; History; Society
KEYWORDS: davidrivkin; democracy; occupywallstreet; rivkin
Casey and Rivkin are the voice of reasons. These occupy wall street hipsters should be occupying the Constitution than camping out in a park or in front of the mayors' driveways.
To: american_steve
Who gets the $13 MILLION bill? The parents?
2
posted on
11/30/2011 8:40:36 AM PST
by
Libloather
(The epitome of civility.)
To: american_steve
Why can't this man find work?
3
posted on
11/30/2011 8:45:32 AM PST
by
jessduntno
("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
To: american_steve
“That is what democracy looks like. The Occupy campers should try it sometime.”
No, actually the Occupiers are practicing democracy, and that IS what it looks like. Rivkin is advocating using rule of law instead.
4
posted on
11/30/2011 8:46:15 AM PST
by
SuzyQue
To: american_steve
The park is private property owned by Brookfield Properties. The surrounding property owners should pool their money and sue Brookfield for damages.
5
posted on
11/30/2011 8:57:28 AM PST
by
isthisnickcool
(Sharia? No thanks.)
To: american_steve
I think that the Richmond Tea Party has the right idea here. Either charge them the proper permit fees or refund all of fees paid for the Tea Party rallies at these locations.
And while the OWS protests go on without law enforcement occurring, this is happening to the Richmond Tea Party:
VA Tea Party Group Faces Audit After Accusing Mayor of Giving Occupiers Preferential Treatment
A Tea Party group in Richmond, Virginia is being audited after it accused the local mayor of giving preferential treatment to the local Occupy movement. They say the audit is an obvious attempt to intimidate and harass us.
Roughly two weeks ago, Richmond Tea Party spokeswoman Colleen Owens told the Richmond Times-Dispatch her group sent Mayor Dwight C. Jones an invoice for about $10,000 it paid the city to hold three Tax Day rallies in a local park. Occupy Richmond protesters have been using the park without paying since October 15. Yesterday, Ms. Owens wrote a blog post for Andrew Breitbarts conservative news site BigGovernment.com accusing the mayor of punishing her group for making a stink.
This audit is an obvious attempt to intimidate and harass us for standing up against the unfair treatment and discrimination against our Tea Party, Ms. Owens wrote.
6
posted on
11/30/2011 9:03:59 AM PST
by
Eagle of Liberty
(Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
To: american_steve
Thought you guys should know. I got a malware warning for that site, so I did not go to it.
7
posted on
11/30/2011 10:48:51 AM PST
by
dsrtsage
(One half of all people have below average IQ...In the US the number is 54%)
To: isthisnickcool
The park is private property owned by Brookfield Properties. The surrounding property owners should pool their money and sue Brookfield for damages. I suggested just that back on Nov.5:
I would suggest that all the neighbors whove had to put up with Zoo-cotti band together and sue the Parks owner for damages. Seems like a good opportunity for some enterprising class-action lawyer.
8
posted on
11/30/2011 12:10:11 PM PST
by
Paine in the Neck
(Where's he getting these ideas? He's not smart enough to be that stupid all by himself.)
To: american_steve
“I know the American People are much attached to their Government;—I know they would suffer much for its sake;—I know they would endure evils long and patiently, before they would ever think of exchanging it for another. Yet, notwithstanding all this, if the laws be continually despised and disregarded, if their rights to be secure in their persons and property, are held by no better tenure than the caprice of a mob, the alienation of their affections from the Government is the natural consequence; and to that, sooner or later, it must come.” - Abraham Lincoln, Lyceum Address, 1838
9
posted on
12/01/2011 7:20:32 AM PST
by
IndePundit
(Bleeding Red)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson