[Sherman Logan]

Thus, the unthinkable could be made real: the greenhouse gas theory of climate change may collapse in the face of empirical evidence that industrialization is shown to have no link to global warming.

Very poorly written, but it doesn't appear to show that at all.

It shows varying concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere in different areas, but doesn't really show how or where it entered the atmosphere.

CO2 IS increasing. That's a fact. If industrialization and fossil fuels have nothing to do with the increase, what's the alternative mechanism?

[o2bfree]

You can rest easy and forget about Global Climate Change. The theory is dead and buried at this point.

The data shows Carbon Dioxide doesn’t cause global warming anyway.

[WayneS]

Higher usage of open wood fires and coal/wood burning stoves in undeveloped/non-industrialized areas?

[Da Coyote]

“...CO2 IS increasing. That’s a fact. If industrialization and fossil fuels have nothing to do with the increase, what’s the alternative mechanism? ...”

Yup, that horrifying increase to almost 3 one hundredths of one percent is really hurting, isn’t it? After all, it’s responsible for our 10+ year cooling that we’re currently undegoing.

[meatloaf]

Lots of natural mechanisms emit CO.

[kidd]

CO2 IS increasing. That's a fact. If industrialization and fossil fuels have nothing to do with the increase, what's the alternative mechanism?

Warmer water holds less carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is released from the oceans as they warm. The oceans warm due to increased solar activity.

Ice core data suppports this alternate mechanism - past history shows that the warming preceeds CO2 increases by about 800 years

[BillM]

Here is a link to give you a hint about where CO2 goes.

CO2 flux in Canada 2008

[Hiddigeigei]

If industrialization and fossil fuels have nothing to do with the increase, what's the alternative mechanism?

There are a number of alternative mechanisms.
Here are several.
Increased temperature has a greater effect on catabolic processes (bacterial activity, oxidation, etc.) which release CO2 from dead plant material than photosynthesis (which fixes carbon in living plant material). During a constant temperature regime, a climax tropical forest (jungle) is pretty much in steady state as far as fixing and releasing carbon. With increased temperature, it should lose biomass (ultimately as CO2) until it arrives at a different steady state.
I would think that the oxidation of thawing tundra would release large quantities of CO2 also. Both processes above are probably not as important to atmospheric CO2 levels as increase ocean surface temperatures on the exchange of CO2, as mentioned elsewhere.

[Publius6961]

If industrialization and fossil fuels have nothing to do with the increase, what's the alternative mechanism?

Blondes.
If not blondes, What?

Silly way to argue anything.