Posted on 11/19/2011 9:10:47 AM PST by MindBender26
Like her or not, there can be no argument that Ann Coulter didn't predict the actions, tactics and results of the Occupy Wall Street movement in her book Demonic.
In her very well written history of the real story of the insanity and mob-driven French Revolution, she could easily be describing the actions of the current OWS movement. The similarities between OWS and the Arab Spring movements to install radical Islamic theocracies are also well illustrated.
The reality is that the OWS movement may grow much more violent as professional anarchists take over and drive us to armed conflict.
Get the book. Coulter describes the left's battleplan to destroy America in great detail.... and it's happening NOW!
The Hi-Lo is: LakeCity-BrownBear. I have DRT’d large game with both.
It could have been one of those Egypt models and jammed on him... lo-end crappola.
OTOH, who would leave their vehicle behind with a pos gun in it?
I think it’s a harbinger of events to come. I think it’s related (this bubbling social meme) to Cain getting SS protection. A lot of crazies out there are ready to snap, I can feel it in my bones. It could be like ‘68, with assassinations that could change the political landscape in radical ways. And there are those in the emerging police state business who welcome every chance to increase their missions and budgets.
If the MSM can divert the masses from this hyper scandal with Kardashian news and courtroom drama updates, we'll know for sure the country is beyond the tipping point.
Thanks for the info on Romney being an “assault weapon” banner.
We are going to look like East Germany on steroids by the time this is over.
His record on guns is almost identical to Clinton’s.
from my personal page:
“Lessons of Vietnam: If the Almight had expected us to depend on the 5.56, He would have made all our enemies 2 feet tall”
:)
Seriously, virtually anything for practice, ONLY the Federal 5.56x45mm Nosler Partition for serious defensive work.
Who cares what she thinks?!?!
To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, A man who is 80% my friend is not 20% my enemy. It seems like some Freepers require 100% agreement or the other person is evil incarnate.
Ann is Romney's proxy, and you are defending her for supporting him.
Let me tell you something....Mitt Romney is NOT an "80% friend" to the conservative, patriotic right. He's a pandering, liberal, big government, machine politician, who will do whatever it takes to become president, including lying through his teeth to get your vote.
As someone else said, Obama is the nine inch knife in the back, while Romney is the six inch knife. Both are going to kill you.
So I see that you intend to give Romney your vote if he's the nominee. You're right. You are in the minority here.
Well, of course I agree with you....and my Beretta 92FS would be fine for stealth and concealment....
If things really fell apart and I had to take a stand somewhere; for example my home....I want some *extended reach* firepower.
Great; that answers my question. Thanks.
Who cares what she thinks?
A lot more people than who read FR!
I agree with you, but I worry about Freepers who demonize those who are not 100% in their camp. By all means, let’s air differences during the primaries, but let’s do so in a thoughtful and civilized way. Some Freepers seem as histrionic as lefties.
That was the point of my second paragraph, which read:
"That said, primary elections are family fights, and must not be waged so bitterly that the family cannot remain united in the general election. A kamikaze primary fight that destroys the possibility of party unity will only benefit the other party. This is why we should fight over issues alone, and not demonize our ideological opponents as "bots" and other useless pejoratives. If we cannot remain allies next November, we will lose."
We are in complete agreement.
Although she seems to be falling under the same influences as it relates to her support of Mitt Romney.
She's espousing the conventional wisdom she so eloquently fillets in her book.
She doesn't deploy logic in her endorsement of Mitt. Instead she resorts to the Liberal/Demonic tactic of emotional tirades, i.e., "Elect Mitt or you will die!"
The problem is, Mitt is just the white version of Barack Clouseau.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.