Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

40 years of microprocessor development
theinquirer.net ^ | Tue Nov 15 2011, 08:00 | By Daniel Robinson

Posted on 11/15/2011 7:04:23 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Timeline As Intel celebrates the 40th birthday of the 4004 chip, The INQUIRER looks at the key landmarks

ON THE OCCASION of the 40th anniversary of Intel's 4004 chip, The INQUIRER believes we have mapped the most significant PC microprocessor developments that have shaped our information technology landscape over the last four decades. The timeline we've come up with is below. µ Link to PDF File below:

microprocessor-timeline-2

 


(Excerpt) Read more at theinquirer.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2011 7:04:25 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

fyi


2 posted on 11/15/2011 7:05:26 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Damn! I remember when the 4004 came out!


3 posted on 11/15/2011 7:08:23 PM PST by null and void (MSGT Dean Hopkins USMC (ret) WWII-Korea-Vietnam 11/9/1925-10/22/2011 My hero, my Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I didn't know anything about the happening.

I wa doing main frame stuff.

4 posted on 11/15/2011 7:15:18 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The Inquirer timeline shows the 1989 Intel 80486 as the first to have an on-chip cache.

The Xerox microprocessor (called a “Low Cost Controller” for political reasons) was the first to have on-chip RAM. First silicon 5/28/1976...


5 posted on 11/15/2011 7:22:00 PM PST by null and void (MSGT Dean Hopkins USMC (ret) WWII-Korea-Vietnam 11/9/1925-10/22/2011 My hero, my Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
the Datapoint 2200. It seems Intel was contracted to replace the TTL parts in the Datapoint with a microprocessor, which turned into the 4004 processor.

6 posted on 11/15/2011 7:25:30 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It was a 4 bit CPU and ran at a blazing clock speed of 740khz (.74mhz)


7 posted on 11/15/2011 7:26:43 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; UriÂ’el-2012; Signalman; blam; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; SierraWasp; ...
We got some good knowledge on this here forum.
8 posted on 11/15/2011 7:35:15 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
And Bell Labs did the transistor:

The Miracle Month

***************************EXCERPT**********************************

The Invention of the First Transistor,
November 17-December 23, 1947

Getting Wet

On November 17, 1947, Walter Brattain dumped his whole experiment into a thermos of water. The silicon contraption he'd built was supposed to help him study how electrons acted on the surface of a semiconductor -- and why whatever they were doing made it impossible to build an amplifier. But condensation kept forming on the silicon and messing up the experiment. To get rid of that condensation, Brattain probably should have put the silicon in a vacuum, but he decided that would take too long. Instead he just dumped the whole experiment under water -- it certainly got rid of the condensation!

Out of the blue, the wet device created the largest amplification he'd seen so far. He and another scientist, Robert Gibney, stared at the experiment, stunned. They began fiddling with different knobs and buttons: by turning on a positive voltage they increased the effect even more; turning it to negative could get rid of it completely. It seemed that whatever those electrons had been doing on the surface to block amplification had somehow been canceled out by the water -- the greatest obstacle to building an amplifier had been overcome.

Putting the Idea to Use

When John Bardeen was told what had happened he thought of a new way to make an amplifier. On November 21, Bardeen suggested pushing a metal point into the silicon surrounded by distilled water. The water would eliminate that exasperating electron problem just under the point as it had in the thermos. The tough part was that the contact point couldn't touch the water, it must only touch the silicon. But as always, Brattain was a genius in the lab. He could build anything. And when this amplifier was built, it worked. Of course, there was only a tiny bit of amplification -- but it worked.

Big Amplification

Once they'd gotten slight amplification with that tiny drop of water, Bardeen and Brattain figured they were on the road to something worthwhile. Using different materials and different setups and different electrolytes in place of the water, the two men tried to get an even bigger increase in current. Then on December 8, Bardeen suggested they replace the silicon with germanium. They got a current jump, all right -- an amplification of some 330 times -- but in the exact opposite direction they'd expected. Instead of moving the electrons along, the electrolyte was getting the holes moving. But amplification is amplification -- it was a start.

Brattain Makes a Mistake

Unfortunately this giant jump in amplification only worked for certain types of current -- ones with very low frequencies. That wouldn't work for a phone line, which has to handle all the complex frequencies of a person's voice. So the next step was to get it to work at all kinds of frequencies.

Bardeen and Brattain thought it might be the liquid which was the problem. So they replaced it with germanium dioxide -- which is essentially a little bit of germanium rust. Gibney prepared a special slab of germanium with a shimmering green oxide layer on one side. On December 12, Brattain began to insert the point contacts.

Nothing happened.

In fact the device worked as if there was no oxide layer at all. And as Brattain poked the gold contact in again and again, he realized that's because there wasn't an oxide layer. He had washed it off by accident. Brattain was furious with himself, but decided to fiddle with the point contact anyway. To his surprise, he actually got some voltage amplification -- and more importantly he could get it at all frequencies! The gold contact was putting holes into the germanium and these holes canceled out the effect of the electrons at the surface, the same way the water had. But this was much better than the version that used water, because now, the device was increasing the current at all frequencies.

Bringing it All Together

In the past month, Bardeen and Brattain had managed to get a large amplification at some frequencies and they'd gotten a small amplification for all frequencies -- now they just had to combine the two. They knew that the key components were a slab of germanium and two gold point contacts just fractions of a millimeter apart. Walter Brattain put a ribbon of gold foil around a plastic triangle, and sliced it through at one of the points. By putting the point of the triangle gently down on the germanium, they saw a fantastic effect -- signal came in through one gold contact and increased as as it raced out the other. The first point-contact transistor had been made.

Telling the Brass

For a week, the scientists kept their success a secret. Shockley asked Bardeen and Brattain to show off their little plastic triangle at a group meeting to the lab and the higher-ups on December 23. After the rest of the lab had a chance to look it over and conduct a few tests, it was official -- this tiny bit of germanium, plastic and gold was the first working solid state amplifier.

9 posted on 11/15/2011 7:42:28 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I may have heard of a computer through my nephew 40 years ago but I was doing my best to keep your car running back in those days Ernest.


10 posted on 11/15/2011 7:48:04 PM PST by tubebender (She was only a whiskey maker, but I loved her still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void

When the 80486 first came out we were installing it in our clones in Fremont, CA and they came back full of bugs from our customers- It was a big loser at first. Intel used the clone mom and pop operations as beta testers for the 80486.


11 posted on 11/15/2011 7:51:53 PM PST by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I never touched a 4004. Was aware of the final product. There where a number of early IC companies in the process of putting out their first single chip processors. The first one I came in contact (physical) with was the Intel 8008 CPU. And at that period of time when I was in the process with some other Westinghouse AeroSpace/Defense Engineers of contemplating building our own personal computer also investigated Fairchild, Motorola and Signetic early CPU lines. The Signetic Pace full 16 bit address line CPU comes to mind. I finally settled on a later design, the Intel 8080 to be the one of choice, but at that period of time ended up purchasing a full system from a Philadelphia Computer developer using the then state of the art if you will, Zilog Z80. I remember borrowing for about a year or so a teletype 33 machine from my employer to connect to that Z80 System. Cromemco was the name of the company that developed that early computer.
I purchased assemblers, and actually a full version of I believe it was Fortran C, as well as some primitive text editors. The machine was a bit faster then the "16 bit wide mini-computer" I worked on at the defense plant that went into the first generation F16 Fire Control Radar system as well as the first generation Harpoon Cruise Missile system we provided the military with.
Boy. Where going back a few years taint we.
12 posted on 11/15/2011 7:54:32 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Cut my computing teeth writing assembly for an 8080...sigh


13 posted on 11/15/2011 7:55:43 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle; ThunderSleeps

Amazing how far we have come...the new AMD Bulldozer chip has 2 billion plus transisters on it.


14 posted on 11/15/2011 8:10:26 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And to think, it all began because we were able to reverse-engineer a transistor from the June, 1947 UFO crash near Roswell. The work was done quickly, and transistors were commercially available by the early 1950s. Here is the "official" story, and I suppose it's a perfectly decent explanation for the masses:

From November 17, 1947 to December 23, 1947, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain at AT&T's Bell Labs in the United States, performed experiments and observed that when two gold point contacts were applied to a crystal of germanium, a signal was produced with the output power greater than the input.[7] Solid State Physics Group leader William Shockley saw the potential in this, and over the next few months worked to greatly expand the knowledge of semiconductors. The term transistor was coined by John R. Pierce as a portmanteau of the term "transfer resistor".

15 posted on 11/15/2011 8:14:10 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; blam
And :

The History of the Integrated Circuit

Photos at the link.

*************************************EXCERPT***************************************

Integrated Circuits

Our world is full of integrated circuits. You find several of them in computers. For example, most people have probably heard about the microprocessor. The microprocessor is an integrated circuit that processes all information in the computer. It keeps track of what keys are pressed and if the mouse has been moved. It counts numbers and runs programs, games and the operating system. Integrated circuits are also found in almost every modern electrical device such as cars, television sets, CD players, cellular phones, etc. But what is an integrated circuit and what is the history behind it?

Photo: Nobelprize.org

 

Electric Circuits

The integrated circuit is nothing more than a very advanced electric circuit. An electric circuit is made from different electrical components such as transistors, resistors, capacitors and diodes, that are connected to each other in different ways. These components have different behaviors.

The transistor acts like a switch. It can turn electricity on or off, or it can amplify current. It is used for example in computers to store information, or in stereo amplifiers to make the sound signal stronger.

The resistor limits the flow of electricity and gives us the possibility to control the amount of current that is allowed to pass. Resistors are used, among other things, to control the volume in television sets or radios.

The capacitor collects electricity and releases it all in one quick burst; like for instance in cameras where a tiny battery can provide enough energy to fire the flashbulb.

The diode stops electricity under some conditions and allows it to pass only when these conditions change. This is used in, for example, photocells where a light beam that is broken triggers the diode to stop electricity from flowing through it.

These components are like the building blocks in an electrical construction kit. Depending on how the components are put together when building the circuit, everything from a burglar alarm to a computer microprocessor can be constructed.

 

The Transistor vs. the Vacuum Tube

Of the components mentioned above, the transistor is the most important one for the development of modern computers. Before the transistor, engineers had to use vacuum tubes. Just as the transistor, the vacuum tube can switch electricity on or off, or amplify a current. So why was the vacuum tube replaced by the transistor? There are several reasons.

The vacuum tube looks and behaves very much like a light bulb; it generates a lot of heat and has a tendency to burn out. Also, compared to the transistor it is slow, big and bulky.

The vacuum tube and the transistor.
Photo: Nobelprize.org
ENIAC-The first digital computer
Photo: U.S Army

 

When engineers tried to build complex circuits using the vacuum tube, they quickly became aware of its limitations. The first digital computer ENIAC, for example, was a huge monster that weighed over thirty tons, and consumed 200 kilowatts of electrical power. It had around 18,000 vacuum tubes that constantly burned out, making it very unreliable.

When the transistor was invented in 1947 it was considered a revolution. Small, fast, reliable and effective, it quickly replaced the vacuum tube. Freed from the limitations of the vacuum tube, engineers finally could begin to realize the electrical constructions of their dreams, or could they?

 

The Tyranny of Numbers

With the small and effective transistor at their hands, electrical engineers of the 50s saw the possibilities of constructing far more advanced circuits than before. However, as the complexity of the circuits grew, problems started arising.

When building a circuit, it is very important that all connections are intact. If not, the electrical current will be stopped on its way through the circuit, making the circuit fail. Before the integrated circuit, assembly workers had to construct circuits by hand, soldering each component in place and connecting them with metal wires. Engineers soon realized that manually assembling the vast number of tiny components needed in, for example, a computer would be impossible, especially without generating a single faulty connection.

Another problem was the size of the circuits. A complex circuit, like a computer, was dependent on speed. If the components of the computer were too large or the wires interconnecting them too long, the electric signals couldn't travel fast enough through the circuit, thus making the computer too slow to be effective.

So there was a problem of numbers. Advanced circuits contained so many components and connections that they were virtually impossible to build. This problem was known as the tyranny of numbers.

 

Jack Kilby's Chip - the Monolithic Idea

Jack S Kilby
Photo: Texas Instruments
Kilbys first chip
Photo: Texas Instruments

 

In the summer of 1958 Jack Kilby at Texas Instruments found a solution to this problem. He was newly employed and had been set to work on a project to build smaller electrical circuits. However, the path that Texas Instruments had chosen for its miniaturization project didn't seem to be the right one to Kilby.

Because he was newly employed, Kilby had no vacation like the rest of the staff. Working alone in the lab, he saw an opportunity to find a solution of his own to the miniaturization problem. Kilby's idea was to make all the components and the chip out of the same block (monolith) of semiconductor material. When the rest of the workers returned from vacation, Kilby presented his new idea to his superiors. He was allowed to build a test version of his circuit. In September 1958, he had his first integrated circuit ready. It was tested and it worked perfectly!

Although the first integrated circuit was pretty crude and had some problems, the idea was groundbreaking. By making all the parts out of the same block of material and adding the metal needed to connect them as a layer on top of it, there was no more need for individual discrete components. No more wires and components had to be assembled manually. The circuits could be made smaller and the manufacturing process could be automated.

Jack Kilby is probably most famous for his invention of the integrated circuit, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in the year 2000. After his success with the integrated circuit Kilby stayed with Texas Instruments and, among other things, he led the team that invented the hand-held calculator.

 

Robert Noyce

Robert Noyce
Photo: Intel Museum Archives

 

Robert Noyce came up with his own idea for the integrated circuit. He did it half a year later than Jack Kilby. Noyce's circuit solved several practical problems that Kilby's circuit had, mainly the problem of interconnecting all the components on the chip. This was done by adding the metal as a final layer and then removing some of it so that the wires needed to connect the components were formed. This made the integrated circuit more suitable for mass production. Besides being one of the early pioneers of the integrated circuit, Robert Noyce also was one of the co-founders of Intel. Intel is one of the largest manufacturers of integrated circuits in the world.

 

Chip Production Today - in Short

Stepping.

 

Chip production today is based on photolithography. In photolithography a high energy UV-light is shone through a mask onto a slice of silicon covered with a photosensitive film. The mask describes the parts of the chip and the UV-light will only hit the areas not covered by the mask. When the film is developed, the areas hit by light are removed. Now the chip has unprotected and protected areas forming a pattern that is the first step to the final components of the chip.

Next, the unprotected areas are processed so their electrical properties change. A new layer of material is added, and the entire process is then repeated to build the circuit, layer by layer. When all the components have been made and the circuit is complete a layer of metal is added. Just as before, a layer of photosensitive film is applied and exposed through a mask. However, this time the mask used describes the layout of the wires connecting all the parts of the chip. The film is developed and the unexposed parts are removed. Next, the metal not protected with film is removed to form the wires. Finally, the chip is tested and packaged.

When making chips today, a process called "stepping" is often used. On a big wafer of silicon the chips are made one next to the other. The silicon wafer is moved in steps under the mask and the UV-light to expose the wafer. In this way, chip after chip can be made using the same mask each time.

Below is a more sequential description of the process of making a modern integrated circuit. But let us first take a look at the special place where integrated circuits are produced - the clean room.

 

The Clean Room

Child facing "bunny suit"
Photo: Intel Museum Archives

 

The sizes of the components on chips produced in a modern chip fabrication plant are extremely small. For a better understanding of how small they are, pick a hair from your head and cut it in half. Now look at the cross section. On this tiny area, hard to see with the bare eye, you can fit thousands of modern transistors.

With sizes this small, the production of a chip demands precision at an atomic level. Tiny particles like a hair, a speck of dust, a dead skin cell, bacteria or even the single particles in tobacco smoke become huge objects that are big enough to ruin a chip.

Therefore, chip production takes place in a clean room. This is a specially designed room, where furniture is built from special materials that don't give off particles, and where extremely effective air filters and air circulation systems change the air completely up to ten times a minute.

To further prevent contamination, workers wear special suits called "bunny suits." These protective outfits are made of ultra clean material and sometimes have their own air filtering systems.

 

Chip Production Today - in Detail

Building an integrated circuit like a computer chip is a very complex process. It is divided into two major parts, front end and back end. In the front end, you make the components of the circuit. In the back end, you add metal to connect the components and then you test and package the chip. Below is a simplified description of the steps.

 

Front End – Construction of the Components

1.
Just as in building a house, you need a construction plan to construct a chip. The construction plans for the chip are made and tested with a computer.

 2.
From the construction plans, masks with the circuit patterns are made.
 3.
Under precisely monitored conditions, a pure silicon crystal is grown. Circuit manufacturing demands the use of crystals with an extremely high grade of perfection.
 4.
The silicon is sawed into thin wafers with a diamond saw. The wafers are then polished in a number of steps until their surface has a perfect mirror-like finish
 5.
The silicon wafer is covered with a layer of insulating silicon oxide.
 6.
A covering film of protective material is put on top of the insulating silicon oxide. This material, a bit like the film in any ordinary camera, is sensitive to light.
 7.
UV-light is shone through a mask and onto the chip. On the parts of the chip that are hit by light, the protective material breaks apart.
 8.
The wafer is developed, rinsed and baked. The development process removes the parts of the protective material exposed to light.
 9.
The wafer is treated with chemicals in a process called "etching." This removes the unprotected insulating material, creating a pattern of non-protected silicon wafer parts surrounded by areas protected by silicon oxide.
 10.
The wafer is run through a process that alters the electrical properties of the unprotected areas of the wafer. This process is called "doping." Steps 5-10 are repeated to build the integrated circuit, layer by layer. Other layers of conducting or isolating layers may also be added to make the components.
  Back End – Adding the Connecting Wires
 11.
Finally, when all the components of the chip are ready, metal is added to connect the components to each other in a process called metalization. This is done in a way similar to the making of the components. First a conducting metal like copper is deposited over the chip.
 12.
On top of the metal a layer of UV-sensitive photo resist is added.
 13.
Next, a mask that describes the desired layout of the metal wires connecting the components of the chip is used. UV-light is shone through this mask. The light hits the photo resist that isn't protected by the mask.
 14.
In the next step, chemicals are used to remove the photo resist hit by UV-light.
 15.
Another step of etching removes the metal not protected by photo resist.
 16.
This leaves a pattern of metal that is the same as the one described by the mask. Now, the chip has a layer of wires that connect its different components.
 17.
Today, most integrated circuits need more than one layer of wires. Advanced circuits may need up to five different layers of metal to form all the necessary connections. In the last picture we have added another layer of metal to our example. As you can see, a layer of insulating material is put between the two metal layers to prevent the wires from connecting in the wrong places. Of course, to add the second layer we had to go through the same steps as when adding the first layer of metal.
 18.
When the final layer of connecting metal wires have been added, the chips on the silicon wafer are tested to see if they perform as intended.
 19.
The chips on the wafer are separated with a diamond saw to form individual integrated circuits.
 20.
Finally, each chip is packed into the protective casing and subjected to another series of tests. The chip is now finished and ready to be shipped to manufacturers of digital devices around the world.

 

The Evolution of the Integrated Circuit

The integrated circuit has come a long way since Jack Kilby's first prototype. His idea founded a new industry and is the key element behind our computerized society. Today the most advanced circuits contain several hundred millions of components on an area no larger than a fingernail. The transistors on these chips are around 90 nm, that is 0.00009 millimeters*, which means that you could fit hundreds of these transistors inside a red blood cell.

Jack Kilby examines a wafer filled with chips.
Photo: Texas Instruments

 

Each year computer chips become more powerful yet cheaper than the year before. Gordon Moore, one of the early integrated circuit pioneers and founders of Intel once said, "If the auto industry advanced as rapidly as the semiconductor industry, a Rolls Royce would get a half a million miles per gallon, and it would be cheaper to throw it away than to park it."***1 inch = 25.4 millimeters
**1 US gallon = 3.8 litres, 1 mile = 1.6 km

 

First published 5 May 2003

16 posted on 11/15/2011 8:18:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
Cut my computing teeth writing assembly for an 8080...sigh

In my case the Z-80 cross assembler was written in FORTRAN, and ran from a card deck. Of course the assembler source was also on cards, and the output was a paper tape to feed into my KSR-33 Teletype.

Before that I hand assembled 8080 and 6502 code.

17 posted on 11/15/2011 8:21:16 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'll second that. When I worked at Bell Labs later on in IC design (Poly Cell Design, and what later was termed ASIC) in the early and mid eighties we where concerned with ever being able to break the 1 micron channel length in our MOS processing techniques. The quantum mechanic models we where using (actually developing) within those technologies showed the limitations beyond that point.
Obviously the models where flawed. By the time I left AT&T in 94, our company was already doing .5 micron and working on .25 micron processes. Somewhere the true limits will be reached. I haven't the slightest idea at this point, and I have been totally away from all IC design and manufacturing for quite a few years at this point, where the dead end will actually occur for poly silicon based technologies.
And with that Ernest, your the last person I communicate with this evening so do have a great upcoming day. I'm off to checking out the CSPAN site for the latest in the Senate Armed Service Committee hearing with SOD Panetta and JCS Chairmen Dempsey.
18 posted on 11/15/2011 8:22:35 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; ShadowAce; Swordmaker; martin_fierro

Shouldn’t that be $28 years?


19 posted on 11/15/2011 8:31:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
"Obviously the models where flawed. By the time I left AT&T in 94, our company was already doing .5 micron and working on .25 micron processes. "

Yup. That's exactly where we were when I left TI at the end of 1994.

20 posted on 11/15/2011 8:39:08 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson