Wrong impression: Wearing skimpy clothes in an environment like the office can have a negative impact
Women wearing skimpy clothes make men dumber.
Nothing has changed. The world is ruled by bare young women. Too bad most of them are too dumb to know that.
young people in the ‘hood are always covered up,
even when it’s 70 or 80 degrees in los angeles.
but they are some of the world’s dullest people.
If we see someone wearing revealing attire we automatically assume they are less competent.
Absolutely
Liz Claman on a cold CNBC set.
The article states, “Research suggests that when men see a woman wearing very little they focus on her body and less on her mind”.
Bwwahhhahhahha! They needed “research” to come to that conclusion?! Can I add one more “conclusion?” Men looking at a beautiful woman in a bikini are statistically not able to answer “what eye color does the model have?”
)
This needed research?
It’s a simple equation. Males of all species have the single biological sexual prerogative to give their sperm to as many females as possible. Human females, however, have the double prerogative to both get the best possible sperm donor, and the best provider male to help them raise their offspring.
For this reason, most males act like predator animals to seek out fertile females, and in *some* species, females perform a “display” to let potential males know that they want to mate.
In practice, this is why men have a fascination with “attractive” women, even in pornography. Women also tend to be very focused on women who are “displaying”, in the manner of “scoping out the competition”, to see what the most successful means of display is at the moment. aka fashion.
However, when there is an abundance of males, the odds of the best sperm donor and the best provider male are slim. This, and the male prerogative are why humans innovated socially enforced marriage, as it gives a much more satisfactory condition for males, and females, and their children.
That is, in exchange for only mating with a single person, the man gets greater assurance that the children will be his; the woman that the man will only make children with her, so that all his provision will go to her and her children, not be divided up. But it only works when marriage is held by society to be sacrosanct.
A problem is that not all people should have children. But those that aren’t supposed to are a problem. This might go far to explain any number of oddities, from homosexuality to prostitution, as ways to protect the “breeders” from outside interference by non-breeders.
This means in an ideal situation, the non-breeders should involve themselves in improving the situation of the group as a whole, which leaves the breeders to just having and raising children.
A situation comparable to a wolf pack, where only the alpha breeding pair have offspring. All the other wolves have other tasks to perform in support of the pack.
Leading to the “bare flesh” phenomenon. People who bare flesh want to mate and raise children, ergo, they don’t have the time or energy to be intellectual.
My first thought "I wonder if that girl can develop spread-spectrum communication technology"
I’ve noticed that as women show more flesh, my intelligence drops
Cheers!