Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deep Reflections from a True Palinista (Vanity but Important)

Posted on 10/09/2011 8:50:20 PM PDT by SarahPalin2012

I had signed up on FR after my overnight subzero wait to meet Sarah for her booksigning (I still have 3 extra signed books). I did not view her possible candidacy as destiny or anything so dramatic, but I had sincerely hoped for it as Sarah is a Godly, wise and brave woman and seems to be so much the opposite of Obama. One of the things that truly impressed me was her advocacy for Israel. I wish Sarah and her family well.

The reason I had hoped for a Palin candidacy was that I had believed that she may be able to start to right the sinking ship that is America. But I fully accept that it will not be the case at least until 2016 (and very possibly never). And for those that likewise believed that Palin was meant to be our candidate, there was once a possibility that even Queen Esther would refuse to be the person that would be instrumental in rescuing Israel. Esther chose to participate, but her uncle Mordecai made it clear that if not Esther, then there would be someone else. My hope for a Palin candidacy was never about Sarah herself. It was because I believed she was someone who would courageously follow the truths of God as it relates to public life and policy. If she will not be a candidate, we must move on and accept that there are reasons for such outcomes.

One thing that is now readily apparent is the fallacy that some believed that Sarah would somehow be more effective at promoting conservative causes as a non-candidate. Sarah was very effective ONLY because of the possibility that she may become president. Without that possibility, she is not much different than someone like Condi Rice--at one time very relevant for America, and for now much less so. To see that Sarah was very instrumental in guiding the 2010 elections and thinking that she could wield such influence even after public knowledge that Sarah was not running -- well that's just very shortsighted.

It's not super important that we decide on a candidate right now. We knew Sarah well -- we may need to look wisely to see who is a genuine conservative that will win. It's important to me however, that we win in 2012 -- I'd even take a win with a less conservative candidate rather than have the alternative outcome.

This is a farewell to all those who have worked so hard for Sarah and America. Thanks Onyx, 2ndDiv, SE Ohio, Virginia Ridgerunner, and so many others. You guys were truly fantastic and tireless. Much admiration for your incredible and gargantuan effort that everyone here knows about. This is probably my last post regarding Sarah. May God forgive and bless America.


TOPICS: AMERICA - The Right Way!!; Miscellaneous; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: palin; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last
To: mylife

No offense, but what power is she wielding? No cheerleader has ever won a game for her team. She can rally the troops to a small extent, but that’s about it. The more impressive her speeches, the more she will dwarf the actual nominee. Blessings, Bob


101 posted on 10/09/2011 11:33:00 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("And your oarsman stands with his knife in hand, and his eyes spell 'Mutiny'" Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

I think the establishment tipped their hand to this fact when they went all out to get Christie to run. I think they know that Romney is having serious issues swaying the base and they thought they could get a replacement in before the filing deadlines. Someone that doesn’t have so much baggage. Luckily, Christie was smart enough to walk away.


102 posted on 10/09/2011 11:33:58 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

Who is this “we”? You and the mouse in your pocket?

JC


103 posted on 10/09/2011 11:34:28 PM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz

GOOD ONE Laz! HAW

JC


105 posted on 10/09/2011 11:36:29 PM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

She has had great influence in the Media


106 posted on 10/09/2011 11:37:08 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Your synopsis makes perfect sense.

Now I understand more about the whole Romney/Christie tie.


107 posted on 10/09/2011 11:37:20 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (I Stand With Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: mylife

If you see this before you go to bed, I wanted to let you know that I have always liked Sarah Palin too. Many of you might have seen my support of Rick Perry. He’s my state’s governor, and I like him very much, just as citizens of Alaska liked what Sarah was doing for their state. But I have always like Sarah Palin, and I hope that I did not say anything on her threads that was ever over the top.

Just wanted you to know that even some of us “other folk” out there in FR are sad about the turn of events that happened as they did and that many of us still hope there is a place for Sarah Palin to be a bright star somehow.

Thanks for letting me share that with you all.


108 posted on 10/09/2011 11:37:20 PM PDT by casinva (The stock in McDonalds has just gone down because Obama has been serving so many whoppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Politics4US
So you are a media puppet?

MB's mouth hurt herself - some of her owns supporters don't support her anymore. That's old news.

The media disliked Palin, so they wouldn’t release polls about candidates being hurt by Palin not announcing.

What is wrong with you? You admit the media hates Sarah but you believe their polls? You are truly confused!

You’re saying now that Palin didn’t have a large group of supporters who were going to vote for her, so you sound like her enemies.

Do you have a problem with understanding the written word or spoken word? Everything you repeat is backwards!! Where did I say Palin didn't have a large group of supporters? SHOW ME.

And CONTINUE - so far you said MB was hurt - it's OLD news that MB hurt herself. You swallow media propaganda and regurgitate it here - don't do that.

Where are the rest of the candidates and how they were hurt. Come one - your integrity is at stake here - otherwise you are PDS sufferer which I said in my first post and you haven't shown me anything to negate that.
109 posted on 10/09/2011 11:37:20 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Completely accurate SatinDoll. Look at the political landscape as it is and as it has been in the last two (at the least) election cycles and you have a ???anybody could guess??? scenario. We are in a very unstable, uncertain environment.


110 posted on 10/09/2011 11:37:50 PM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cracker45

We as in me, my wife, my two sons and two daughters in laws.

Not to mention several of my co-workers.

Get my drift?


111 posted on 10/09/2011 11:40:55 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (I Stand With Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Michele Bachmann would have been the leader of the field from the beginning if Palin had announced she wasn’t running, and Palin also hurt the other similar candidates. Bachmann’s mouth didn’t hurt her. Rick Perry hurt and Romney hurt her.

If Palin not announcing didn’t hurt the other candidates, then that would mean she didn’t have a large base of support. You are trying to have it both ways.

“What is wrong with you? You admit the media hates Sarah but you believe their polls? You are truly confused!”

You asked me for proof about Palin hurting the candidates, and I said the media wouldn’t want Palin to look like she had a lot of support.


112 posted on 10/09/2011 11:42:47 PM PDT by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Politics4US
The other Republicans were hurt, because Palin supporters didn’t support the other candidates until Palin made a decision.

I'm not sure it would have made much of a difference if Palin had announced earlier. Some Palin supporters have made the transition to other candidates quickly, while others have not. I doubt that equation would have changed, but even if it did, I doubt it would have had much effect on the race. We would still have the same players as we do right now.

113 posted on 10/09/2011 11:42:59 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

Curl up in a fetal position - lest you have a complete meltdown. Your drama is pathetic.


114 posted on 10/09/2011 11:43:40 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: csense

I didn’t decide, because of Palin not announcing.


115 posted on 10/09/2011 11:43:58 PM PDT by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

You’re delusional, she clearly refused to indicate one way or the other until the decision was done and made that very clear every time she was asked - about twice per week on average!

JC


116 posted on 10/09/2011 11:44:24 PM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: casinva

Let her go be a bright star.

Right now Rick Perry is in the arena.


117 posted on 10/09/2011 11:45:00 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Politics4US
Palin also hurt the other similar candidates.

WHO and HOW? Your last chance to demonstrate some integrity.

MB hurt herself - stop your deception - even her staff left her!
118 posted on 10/09/2011 11:46:27 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Ditto!


119 posted on 10/09/2011 11:47:39 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (I Stand With Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

Check this out:

See #68
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2790252/posts?q=1&;page=51

We could end up with a free-for-all on the nominating convention floor nest year.


120 posted on 10/09/2011 11:47:55 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson