Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCO Loses Again, Original Verdict Upheld
Internet News ^ | 30 August 2011 | Sean Michael Kerner

Posted on 08/31/2011 5:08:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce

From the 'What? They're Still at It?!' files:

I really had thought that we'd heard the last of SCO, which is is why I was surprised today.

SCO was defeated again this week, this time it was an appeal (likely the final appeal) in the Novell vs. SCO case over who owns the Unix copyrights. This was the appeal of the verdict issued over year ago that confirmed Novell's ownership.

The wheels of justice in the U.S. sure do seem to move in slow motion at times.

While this case has been on the appeals docket for such a long time, we haven't heard much from what's left of SCO. The company has now been splintered with UniXs Group running what used to be the product division and SCO itself just a shell for legal actions.

Without ownership of the Unix copyrights, SCO really is dead (but they don't seem to accept that fact and never have). Without those copyrights they can't proceed against IBM or anyone else.

All that said, the appeal verdict confirm Novell's ownership which is another issue altogether.

Novell doesn't exist in the form it did last year after having been acquired by Attachmate for $2.2 billion. Many of Novell's patents have been sold off to a consortium that includes Microsoft, though Novell has publicly stated that Unix copyrights were not part of the sale.

Still those copyrights are out there, though at this point they likely represent zero risk to Linux.

Somehow I don't think we've heard the last of SCO quite yet, even though I don't have a clue how they can still continue their legal challenges. Then again, many thought that SCO was dead years ago, but this is one zombie of a company that just keeps on coming, even when it really has nothing left to sustain itself.

As the Linux community celebrates the 20th anniversary of Linux this month, it's good to remember the whole SCO episode. It was a challenge that Linux overcame and defeated (even if SCO continues to deny they've lost).


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: linux; sco

1 posted on 08/31/2011 5:08:13 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 08/31/2011 5:09:05 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: ShadowAce

SCO is still with us? Good grief. I was sure it was finally and completely dead.


4 posted on 08/31/2011 5:33:06 AM PDT by newzjunkey (This is why we can't have nice things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I was, as well. I was quite surprised to see this article.


5 posted on 08/31/2011 5:40:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Let me just say this about SCO ...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


6 posted on 08/31/2011 5:43:33 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Hope this is the final step in putting the stake through the heart of this vampire, SCO.

Miserable legal parasites.


7 posted on 08/31/2011 5:57:05 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Any article about SCO's bogus challenge to Linux should mention Pamela Jones and Groklaw. Without her tireless efforts, and those of the folks who contributed to Groklaw, the SCO challenge might well have succeeded.
8 posted on 08/31/2011 7:03:20 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Somehow I don't think we've heard the last of SCO quite yet, even though I don't have a clue how they can still continue their legal challenges.

Microsoft still has lots to spend...

9 posted on 08/31/2011 2:09:17 PM PDT by NCjim (Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I’m mad that they cost a couple companies, IBM and Novell, a lot of money to defend, and now they’re just going to fold, and IBM, Autozone and Novell won’t get much, if anything. Red Hat will also get no justice.

The corporate veil needs to be pierced here, and the responsible parties made to pay individually.


10 posted on 08/31/2011 4:36:25 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
the responsible parties made to pay individually.

Yep, and Microsoft leaned on RBC to finance the company's litigation excursion.

11 posted on 08/31/2011 4:56:03 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson