Skip to comments.
Linux is 20 years old today
The Enquirer ^
| Thu Aug 25 2011, 00:09
| Egan Orion
Posted on 08/26/2011 8:39:07 PM PDT by allmost
ONE MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT, a student at the University of Helsinki posted a query to the newsgroup comp.os.minix asking, "What would you like to see most in minix?" The student's name was Linus Torvalds, and that Usenet post was the beginning of the Linux operating system (OS). The date was 25 August 1991, exactly 20 years ago today.
Pictured-used-and-licensed-under-the-GNU-Free-Distribution-License-by-linuxmag-com-Martin-StreicherIn 1991 Unix had existed for about 20 years since the early 1970s, Apple had come out with its Mac OS in 1984, and Microsoft had been flogging Windows since 1985. Torvalds' ambitions for his "new (free) operating system" were modest. It was to be "just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu"
(Excerpt) Read more at theinquirer.net ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; History; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: hitech; linustorvalds; linux; technical
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
This is via Slashdot.org.
1
posted on
08/26/2011 8:39:11 PM PDT
by
allmost
To: allmost
Don’t trust anyone under 30.
2
posted on
08/26/2011 8:42:00 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: allmost
3
posted on
08/26/2011 8:49:12 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(If the government was in charge of the desert , we'd soon have a shortage of sand.)
To: Baynative
And I respond to you through it. Apache.
4
posted on
08/26/2011 8:54:51 PM PDT
by
allmost
To: allmost
Linux is the kernel - GNU is the rest.
p.s., thank you
GNU and Linus.
5
posted on
08/26/2011 9:06:38 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Income != Wealth)
To: allmost
2011...the year of Linux on the desktop! LOL
6
posted on
08/26/2011 9:07:35 PM PDT
by
Astronaut
To: Astronaut
We already have “UNIX on the desktop” that’s widely used—it’s called MacOS X, which uses a UNIX variant with the Mach kernel. Indeed, Apple’s iOS is also based on UNIX with a Mach kernel.
7
posted on
08/26/2011 9:12:19 PM PDT
by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: Astronaut
I've used Ubuntu to recover Windows passwords for others. It works. Like I stated previously it works well enough for FR to use it. It is a little more important than Jobs quitting(again) imo.
8
posted on
08/26/2011 9:17:36 PM PDT
by
allmost
To: ShadowAce
9
posted on
08/26/2011 9:23:39 PM PDT
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: allmost
It makes a nice rescue disk and maybe a good server, but for a personal desktop it still stinks. I used Linux as a desktop for a couple of years, but eventually had to go to Windows XP for compatibility and ease of use. Every year I go back and try a few distros. This year I got all sorts of application crashes, locked up the kernel playing a Youtube video, all sorts of trouble using all the buttons on a Logitech mouse, and worst of all, a keylogger in a Fedora spin distro stole my ID and password and tried to break into one of my email accounts.
The Linux community is its own worst enemy.
10
posted on
08/26/2011 9:32:01 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
You are registering my response via Apache. Never touched Fedora, sounds like you don’t recommend it. The desktop interfaces are crappy, but you stated it makes a good rescue disk. I agree.
11
posted on
08/26/2011 9:38:39 PM PDT
by
allmost
To: Moonman62
The Linux community is its own worst enemy. Indisputably.
To: Astronaut; rdb3
2011...the year of Linux on the desktop! LOL Total world domination! (and fast) -- Linus
[Linux user since 1992 (kernel 0.99p12) and JAPH, impatient and loaded with hubris]
13
posted on
08/26/2011 10:07:02 PM PDT
by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
To: andyk
p.s., thank you GNU and Linus. How long do you think GNU's Richard Stallman would last here on FR before he was zotted? :-)
(I've always got to separate his abrasive personality, philosophy and politics from the nice code he's hacked out over the years).
14
posted on
08/26/2011 10:11:17 PM PDT
by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
I started using Linux in 1992. I think I started when it was kernel Version 0.16 or Version 0.17. I know I downloaded and examined earlier versions; I think version 0.11d or 0.11e before actually getting it to work on my 386. I seem to recall there was a hard disk change and driver problems about then and involved MFM hard disks. I don't recall much about the details. I've been using it consistently since 1992, along with several other operating systems. I have deployed Linux in several professional networking and personal usage environments with a lot of success. After I got it working, I also recall that after I got Linux running, I used it instead of using minix. I can even recall Linus giving Tannenbalm the verbal bird in a reply email a few years after Linux was up and running. LOL !
Distributions became popular quite soon. One of the earlier distros was Yyagrasil and there was one by Pat Volkerding that eventually evolved into Slackware.
All in all, its been quite an enjoyable learning opportunity. Thank you, Linus.
15
posted on
08/26/2011 10:34:38 PM PDT
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: pyx
I think I mis-spelled ... It should be Yggdrasil. They had a distro near the end of 1992. But I didn't start using their distro (for a short time) until around mid 1993 or so.
16
posted on
08/26/2011 10:39:30 PM PDT
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: pyx
How odd. There doesn't seem to be a kernel version 0.16 or 0.17 available. None-the-less, I do recall using very early versions after the MFM drivers were available and then downloading them by ftp from funet in Finland.
17
posted on
08/26/2011 10:53:40 PM PDT
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: pyx
How odd. There doesn't seem to be a kernel version 0.16 or 0.17 available. You probably are referring to the patch level for those numbers. Kernel 0.99 was around in 1992 and the numeric version was suffixed with p12, p13, p14 and so on.
The distros you cited of that era also included the early TAMU package from Aggieland - Texas A&M ("Hullabaloo, Caneck! Caneck!").
18
posted on
08/26/2011 11:06:44 PM PDT
by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
To: re_nortex
It may have been a patch, but I was using Linux much much earlier than v 0.99. Like I said, I was actually using Linux in 1992. v 0.99 was not around until more than one year or possibly two years later in very late 1993 or early 1994.
19
posted on
08/26/2011 11:15:51 PM PDT
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: Moonman62; allmost
CentOS, I watch videos, everything I need. openoffice for apps. I pared down the install from the outset, have nothing extra running (if you know what i mean) other than what i use for sec reasons.
no problems.
i also installed it on one of those tiny dell notebooks. use a 3g verizon cell modem. everything works great. memory sticks work fine to move files.
i can’t imagine running m$ for my personal stuff, totally unacceptable.
20
posted on
08/26/2011 11:21:38 PM PDT
by
PieterCasparzen
(We need to fix things ourselves)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson