1 posted on
08/18/2011 7:31:44 AM PDT by
opentalk
To: opentalk
Excellent article and so true.
To: opentalk
He stole the Democrat nomination, but he was elected because of his skin color.
7 posted on
08/18/2011 7:49:20 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Profit" is a measure of how efficiently an entity utilizes the raw materials at its command.)
To: opentalk
What an absolutely clear and succinct assessment.
When the book is finally closed on “O” (and that can't be soon enough) no one will know any more about him than they know now.
8 posted on
08/18/2011 7:50:38 AM PDT by
SMARTY
(A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.)
To: opentalk
“Did I do that?” - [Steve Urkel] Obama...
10 posted on
08/18/2011 8:04:34 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: opentalk
I have a theory that he is a con artist. Now, I know that every politician is to one degree or another a bit of a con, but what I am suggesting is that Barack Obama is a honest-to-goodness-dyed-in-the wool con artist right from the beginning. He has conned his way along all his life, and somewhere along the way he got the notion that he could con his way into the White House. Look at the signs. He has multiple aliases. He has well covered footprints. He has never actually DONE anything, yet he has been able to talk his way into better and better jobs. And look how he acts now, as president. You con your way into the presidency not for the responsibilities, but for the perks.
I believe that Barack Obama has never wanted to be the greatest President in history. He has wanted to be the greatest Con Artist in history. And, damn, if he hasn't succeeded.
11 posted on
08/18/2011 8:05:37 AM PDT by
fhayek
To: opentalk
The surest way to get a liberal frothing at the mouth is to call Obama an “affirmative action” president or even a token and yet the evidence is so true.
I would even have arguments with liberals who told me Bush 43 was unqualified to be president after six years as governor of Texas and I would say it was a lot more qualified than someone who was a two-term state senator and a 1/2-term as U.S. Senator where the only experience he had at running anything was running his mouth and being 1/100th of a deciding vote. He’d never had to balance a budget or meet a payroll.
That inexperience chicken has come home to roost.
17 posted on
08/18/2011 8:20:27 AM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
To: opentalk
AA was supposed to make up for past discrimination for those who were descendants of slaves not slaveowners
19 posted on
08/18/2011 8:29:07 AM PDT by
hecht
(TAKE BACK OUR NATION AND OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM)
To: opentalk; All
I suspect a tectonic shift is about to happen in the national dialoge questioning as to how WE could have been bamboozled by this know nothing marxist regurgitator.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson