1 posted on
08/15/2011 4:08:21 AM PDT by
massmike
To: massmike
The donors should get hazard pay,IMHO!
2 posted on
08/15/2011 4:11:14 AM PDT by
massmike
(Massachusetts:Stopped hanging witches;started electing Kennedys.Coincidence?)
To: massmike
Lipstick lesbians shouldn’t pay at all...lol.
To: massmike
Bringing one’s lunch to work is always cheaper than eating out.
4 posted on
08/15/2011 4:12:06 AM PDT by
Rebelbase
(Rick Perry was a democrat. So was Reagan. Oh crap.)
To: massmike
Artificial insemination costs vary widely across Sweden, forcing some same-sex couples to pay significantly more than heterosexual couples who save thousands of kronor by bringing their own sperm. So bring your own sperm and you'll get the cheaper rate too, problem solved. :-p
5 posted on
08/15/2011 4:12:14 AM PDT by
YankeeReb
To: massmike
from the article: *****this is not a medical problem*****
NO - it is a MORAL PROBLEM.
7 posted on
08/15/2011 4:15:30 AM PDT by
sodpoodle
(Despair: Man's surrender. Laughter: God's redemption.)
To: massmike
The twisted logic of the gay community continues to astound. First and foremost, these lesbian ‘couples’ pay the same exact amount as likely an equal amount of heterosexual couples where the male is unable to produce fertile sperm. So they are paying the same amount as heterosexual couples who are in the same situation as they are.
But beyond that, you know they are not talking about raising everyone’s fees to be on the same block, they want the discounted rates where they no longer have to pay for collected and preserved sperm from donors. In effect, they want to turn the state into sperm buyers with the end result being that the state collects and distributes sperm for free.
Gimme, gimme, gimme - the more protected classes are created, the more those classes will demand special treatments and gifts.
9 posted on
08/15/2011 4:18:29 AM PDT by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: massmike
The writer works for the NYP, right?
" .. heterosexual couples who save thousands of kronor by bringing their own sperm."
OK .. somehow someone is able to retrieve sperm and take it somewhere that puts it into a woman, right?
Why not just use God's injector and save all the money?
10 posted on
08/15/2011 4:23:21 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: massmike
After he won the Triple Crown in 1974, iirc, Secretariat was syndicated for something like $20,000,000 and spent the rest of his life pursuing every American boy’s dream job.
To: massmike
"We think that it is discriminatory that there are different prices for insemination..."Sounds like a line out of some B grade sci-fi.
13 posted on
08/15/2011 4:45:40 AM PDT by
mitch5501
(My guitar wants to kill your momma!)
To: massmike
Well, that’s just nuts !!!
To: massmike
Just an observation but human sperm must be about the cheapest commodity on earth. It seems every producer is insanely eager to get rid of every bit he can produce.
16 posted on
08/15/2011 5:22:47 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing an idiot)
To: massmike
We think that it is discriminatory that there are different prices for insemination, Really? Based on what? Are you receiving the same service...No? You have to buy an additional "product" then get the service performed? I see. There is no discrimination here. The discrimination card is even more worn-out than the race card.
19 posted on
08/15/2011 6:05:34 AM PDT by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: massmike
What’s the world coming to?
20 posted on
08/15/2011 6:07:58 AM PDT by
Blado
(Audemus jura nostra defendere)
To: massmike
My dog fails to crap gold nuggets so I need to buy gold on the open market. It’s not fair.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson