Posted on 08/14/2011 7:12:33 PM PDT by Clairity
D, it’s like this. You aren’t the first person to cry witch hunt and start whining that we Palin cultists are perceived horribly. Here’s a hint. We don’t much give a rat’s digestive tract what you and your ‘hidden cabal’ think of us personally or politically. Nor do I personally care if you think I’m original. Frankly you aren’t worth the time it would take to ponder an original thought on the matter, so I resort to the tried and true...and you are in hella denial.
Now go play with your empty Guardisl boxes delivered on the Illegal Immigrant Highway by Mexican unsafe trucks and Mexican unskilled drivers while the rest of us try to avoid your boy’s attitude toward our borders from infecting the rest of what’s left of America.
PS...The Goddess forgives you your sins
Normie
Chief Druid of Trollhenge
Cult of Palin
Yawn..................
Careful guys, THE MIGHTY D says there’s a secret cabal out there emailing furiously amongst themselves about evil people like us who support Palin. We are like high school bullies if we don’t fall and worship Perry you know.
Read back a few posts from here. He’she/whatever was very upset ;)
The clowns could come for us in the night or something I guess... And “We don’t know who we are dealing with” I guess.
Where is it? Come on! WHERE?
What's RINO Perry said? Let's see...
In A December 2006 editorial, Gov. Perry wrote: "I would rather know who is crossing our border legally to work instead of not knowing who is crossing our border illegally to work. A guest worker program that provides foreign workers with an ID removes the incentive for millions of people to illegally enter our country. It also adds those workers to our tax base, generates revenue for needed social services and it can be done without providing citizenship." and "Along with millions of Americans, I think it is wrong to reward those who broke our laws with citizenship ahead of those who have followed the law and are waiting to enter this country legally. And like millions of Americans I do not support amnesty." (Emphasis mine.)
No-more-crooked-establishment-RINOs-like-Slick-Rick-Perry-PING! :)
The "big sin" he's associated with is a Texas dream law 10 years ago which passed with veto proof majorities. It was tightened in 2005 and a repeal bill never even made it out of committee this term. Here's an FR thread explaining the Texas dream law.
Perry's signed bills against human trafficking (HB 1372, 4008 & SB 11 of '07), on increased border security (probably the Rangers on the border he's mentioned; HB1 of '07), for tougher employer sanctions (HB 1196 of '07), on document fraud (HB 126 of '07) and signed Voter ID. Source: http://www.txcc.org/illegal-immigration & Reuters (Voter ID signing)
As he mentioned in the Waterloo, IA Q&A Sunday, he did send Rangers to the border: Texas governor sends Rangers to Mexico border (2009)
He also mentioned arial assets on the border:
Texas Gov. Rick Perry says Predator drones should patrol Texas border (2009)
Texas gets a second aerial drone for border security (2011)
He's not for amnesty or "pathway to citizenship" as a reward:
In A December 2006 editorial, Gov. Perry wrote: "I would rather know who is crossing our border legally to work instead of not knowing who is crossing our border illegally to work. A guest worker program that provides foreign workers with an ID removes the incentive for millions of people to illegally enter our country. It also adds those workers to our tax base, generates revenue for needed social services and it can be done without providing citizenship." and "Along with millions of Americans, I think it is wrong to reward those who broke our laws with citizenship ahead of those who have followed the law and are waiting to enter this country legally. And like millions of Americans I do not support amnesty." (Emphasis mine.)
Source: http://governor.state.tx.us/news/editorial/10326/
He's a critic of E-Verify's lack of impact on Texas but it is used in thousands of Texas business although not required. However, Texas does require and use the I-9 "employment eligibility" forms which is where E-Verify is supposed to take its info. So in a real sense Texas already verifies eligibility, and under Perry it became harder on employers who violate the law and those who provide documents to defraud employers. Hutchison says Texas state doesn't use E-Verify to weed out undocumented workers applying for jobs (PolitiFact, 2010)
A mandatory E-Verify bill failed to pass the Texas legislature this year Business leaders say mandatory ‘E-Verify’ plan would harm small businesses (2011)
Perry also got a ban on driver's licenses for illegals through too (SB 1). ID measure passed quietly, while sanctuary cities bill died noisily
A bill banning "sanctuary cities," added by Perry to the recent special session, passed the Senate but failed in the Texas House. Same story as above: ID measure passed quietly, while sanctuary cities bill died noisily
Gee. Look at that! Old open borders RINO Rick, Governor Goodhair. He's never done anything about illegal immigration or border control. /s
Over the years illegals have came over one at a time, we can send them back the same way.
Using I-9 forms does absolutely nothing re: illegal eligibility, as employers are expressly forbidden from questioning doubtful (fake) IDs.
Perry’s only ‘toughness’ on illegal immigration is in the last two years, running up to his presidential campaign. He’s got a decade of being dreadful on it.
“Yawn..................”
Tired after a hard day’s troll? Time for nappy poo. ;)
zotted again eh pissant?
Stick with the falcon party loser.
I think its funny, though his reply is even better.
And I’m sure you missed where I criticized Palin for using the ABO line. It’s wrong and she’s wrong.
You don't like him. That's fine. He's kinda weird, maybe he's too cozy with business interests although I don't know that's a bad thing in this jobless economy. We'll see how his campaign unfolds.
I'm posting what I find out to fight against misinformation. I'm not committed although may be I should be.
If I'm in CA for the election, my vote won't mean anything and I fully expect the Republicans will find a way to lose it all in 2012. They're really good at that.
If you’re really open-minded and Perry’s long-time pro-illegals position would bother you, here’s something for you to read:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61076.html
I would like to believe that a "guest worker program" does not lead to citizenship, but I am not convinced. Many millions are here illegally because of expired visas. Guest workers sire anchor babies.
And even assuming we can trust Perry's intentions, the larger the pool of potential amnesty candidates, the greater the danger of importing 10s of millions of leftist voters. Let's say Perry was POTUS 8 years, accumulating guest workers the whole time, with no amnesty. Think those programs are going away? No, they will still be here, and you can bet the leftists (and perhaps RINOs too) will keep trying to "bring them out of the shadows" and make them all voters.
And we have over 9% unemployment, probably double that in reality!
If Perry had mentioned some of those little problems I mentioned, I might have more confidence he and his brain trust had even thought about them.
Palin's approach is similar, and perhaps worse, because her program itself could lead to "a path to citizenship" and voting (it's really unclear). On O'Reilly in 2010 she proposed registering and providing work for illegals, as long as they "follow the steps" in her program.
You got that right.........."compassionate conservatism" was nothing more than a devious plan to kick so/con Repubs out of the party. GWB was duped and dumbed down by the pukeneos who had a "Master Plan" to takeover the Repubs (since they had already decimated the Dems).
As Fox talker Billy Kristol's daddy wrote: "the historical task and political purpose of neo-conservatism is to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy." Irving Kristol, August 25, 2003 issue, Weekly Standard.
“Hate to break it to you Bob, but not only has she not explained that Univision interview, but she said more of the same on O’Relly in 2010: “
To be honest, I think that I heard that also...in fact I’ve posted to that extent. That’s the nice thing about having a large field of candidates to choose from - I don’t need Sarah, but she, of course, is still much better than Perry, with all his other weird stuff.
And we're not going away either, despite your secret emailings. I bet you have a list too. Nice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.