Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin on Immigration (in her own words)
On the Issues ^ | Updated Aug 2011 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 08/14/2011 7:12:33 PM PDT by Clairity

Supports a path to citizenship, but no amnesty for illegals

Q: Should undocumented immigrants all should be deported?

A: There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant - there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants - not only economically is that just an impossibility but that's not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue.

Q: Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 million undocumented immigrants?

A: No, I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. We have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.

Q: So you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?

A: I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.

Source: Univision Interview with Sarah Palin, by Jorge Ramos Oct 26, 2008

=====

Took no action on Alaska's "sanctuary cities" Lou Dobbs notes that at least two of Alaska's cities have been officially designated as sanctuary cities: "An August 14, 2006 report produced by the Congressional Research Service listed 31 cities and counties that have 'don't ask, don't tell' sanctuary policies in place. They [include] Anchorage, Alaska [and] Fairbanks, Alaska. Alaska and Oregon both have state-wide policies that forbid state agencies from using resources to enforce federal immigration law."

Apparently, this is by design from the highest levels.

In fact, a resolution to that effect was passed in the Alaska state legislature in 2003 (before Palin's election): "[Alaska] House Joint Resolution 22 - May 2003: Establishes that state agencies and instrumentalities may not use state resources or institutions for the enforcement of federal immigration laws, which are the responsibility of the federal government."

It’s not clear whether Gov. Palin has ever weighed in, pro or con, on Alaska’s sanctuary policies.

Source: Lou Dobbs reported on lafrontera.mojo4m.com Sep 5, 2006

====

Tightened restrictions on illegal alien's drivers licenses

There has been an ongoing fight in Alaska over drivers' licenses for illegals. A bill banning drivers' licenses for illegals passed the Alaska state senate in 2003 [before Palin was elected governor]: "JUNEAU (AP) - The state Senate approved a bill that tightens the standards for getting a driver’s license by requiring applicants prove they are in the country legally and by placing time limits on licenses for legal aliens."

The measure did not pass into law. In any event, Palin's DMV subsequently tightened the administrative regulations on drivers' licenses, thereby giving rise to a lawsuit by some folks who found the new restrictions inconvenient.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; clairity; elections; illegalimmigration; immigration; palin; perry; rinoricky; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-432 next last
To: gov_bean_ counter

Hiya good FRiend! Good to see you again!
WELCOME!


101 posted on 08/14/2011 8:29:21 PM PDT by onyx (If you enjoy FR, support it! If you support Sarah Palin & want on her Busy Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thanks. I can see 2012 from my back porch!!!


102 posted on 08/14/2011 8:30:23 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
When you get the full picture of Perry, after he has been vetted, you will be throwing something, Onyx, but it will be “at” him rather than “to” him and it won’t be your support. LOL

ROTFLOL. Well, I am looking forward to learning more about him. I hope I'm not disappointed.

103 posted on 08/14/2011 8:31:24 PM PDT by onyx (If you enjoy FR, support it! If you support Sarah Palin & want on her Busy Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Aetius

“The DREAM Act, well see, the immigrants of the past, they had to literally and figuratively stand in line to become U.S. citizens,” said Palin. “I’d like to see that continue, and unfortunately the DREAM Act kind of usurps that, the system.”


104 posted on 08/14/2011 8:31:32 PM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

I thought this drivel sounded familiar!


105 posted on 08/14/2011 8:31:46 PM PDT by proudtobeanamerican1 (A house divided against itself cannot stand.” Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

OK WISE GUY!


106 posted on 08/14/2011 8:32:51 PM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

LMAO


107 posted on 08/14/2011 8:33:32 PM PDT by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
Gee, maybe I shouldn't have taken it for granted that any reader would take it on faith that along with dumping minimum wage and dumping all the freebies we taxpayer give to illegals, that there would also be AS HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE LAW in any case, prosecution against illegals. The problem has NEVER been lack of prosecution; lack of prosecution came after the fact. The CAUSE is very high wages for non-skilled labor in combination with all kinds of government freebies. Illegals are now here in such great numbers that prosecution is like trying to kill an entire bee hive of 80 million bees one bee at a time: a losing battle. The answer lies ELSEWHERE.

Dumping minimum wage (along with reducing or eliminating all kinds of other regulations employers have to observe with regard to employees) would work MIRACLES in every aspect of the economy. Teen employment would boom. Employment of unskilled but intelligent Americans would boom. Employers could afford to pay workers what they were worth. Have you ever been to Mexico and seen the cities of cardboard boxes? Whole suburbs? A hardworking Mexican kid18 or 20 who snuck up to the states, rent a super-cheap motel room with two friends, and get -- and hold on to -- a 40-hr-week job as a dishwasher in a Denny's -- you had better bet your ass that that kid is going to show up for work. Chances are he and his roomies are sending most of the money back to Mexico to their families.

Their competition for those jobs is dominated by immature kids, drop-outs, unskilled, who hate being a dishwasher, think it's beneath them, keep the job for maybe four months before quitting, because minimum wage to them is nothing. Drop that minimum wage (along with the freebies), and the illegal Mexican doesn't have nearly the motivation to come here. And the employer sure as hell doesn't have the motivation, especially if the INS is on his back, to hire illegals. He can hire American kids. If minimum wage went down, the price of EVERYTHING would go down. So a teenager working for what he was worth, would have money worth something.

108 posted on 08/14/2011 8:33:40 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: onyx

2,4,6,8...!


109 posted on 08/14/2011 8:34:08 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Spirit of Liberty
Since 2009, Gov. Perry has repeatedly urged the federal government, through conversations with and letters to President Barack Obama, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, to approve his request for 1,000 Title 32 National Guardsmen to support civilian law enforcement efforts to enhance border security in Texas. On Monday, Gov. Perry reiterated that request in a four-page letter he presented to President Obama as he arrived for an appearance in Austin. In the absence of adequate federal resources, Texas has proactively addressed border security with state funding, resources and personnel to protect our citizens. The State of Texas has committed more than $230 million over the last several years to amplify border security efforts and to shut down transnational gangs that work for Mexican drug cartels.

Texas has 64% of the border and receives 20% of federal funding to protect it.
110 posted on 08/14/2011 8:34:22 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

I am their professor. How old are you? I’m thinking an old guy, if you don’t understand the use of the word “haters.”


111 posted on 08/14/2011 8:36:09 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DRey

Professor? Lord help them.


112 posted on 08/14/2011 8:37:06 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I like Palin. I hope she’s Perry’s VP and believe that’s why she’s being coy about whether or not she’ll run. No one is trying to tear Palin down as much as point out that like Perry, she is imperfect. Perhaps you have missed the anti-Perry spammers and trolls so active in the last 24 hours? It’s been an all-out assault on those of us who like Perry. I appreciated Clairity’s post, not because it brought down Palin or brought “up” Perry, but because it smacked the Perry-haters in the face. That’s all.


113 posted on 08/14/2011 8:38:54 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Day 45 and the Freepathon is still on. Please donate today.
Click it.

114 posted on 08/14/2011 8:39:19 PM PDT by RedMDer (Abolish FReepathons. Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DRey

“That’s why he’s been elected for the last 27 YEARS.”

Perry=Walking, talking argument for term limits


115 posted on 08/14/2011 8:39:31 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: DRey

Would that be the Webster’s “haters” or the Urban “haters”?


116 posted on 08/14/2011 8:40:40 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

This is the problem in general with candidates. When you’re a short-term governor of a minor-league state and don’t have to deal with any national issues like immigration, all there is to go on is what you say or what you Facebook post. Experienced politicians like Perry have to actual DO something, not just retweet.


117 posted on 08/14/2011 8:41:13 PM PDT by magritte ("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DRey

“E-Verify doesn’t work against the illegal’s gold standard — fake i.d. = E-Verify does not work.”

Please explain. If Jose uses a fake ID with someone else’s SS# (say, John Smith), why wouldn’t an E-Verify search send up a red flag to the employer that Jose’s SS# does not match the name of John Smith?


118 posted on 08/14/2011 8:41:40 PM PDT by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: rintense
You're absolutely right about that rin! (provided the lamestreams wants to vet him *during the primary* season.
119 posted on 08/14/2011 8:42:01 PM PDT by onyx (If you enjoy FR, support it! If you support Sarah Palin & want on her Busy Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DRey; onyx
I hope she’s Perry’s VP

Not a chance. She won't run with a McCain redux.

No one is trying to tear Palin down

Shall I quote some of your posts? With links to them?

I appreciated Clairity’s post, not because it brought down Palin or brought “up” Perry, but because it smacked the Perry-haters in the face.

You came on with both guns blazing. Nice back peddling though.

120 posted on 08/14/2011 8:42:41 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-432 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson