Posted on 08/12/2011 4:38:43 AM PDT by RobinMasters
President Obama's potentially criminal use of a mysterious, Connecticut-based Social Security Number should become an important issue in his quest for re-election in 2012, says a former presidential candidate and ambassador in Ronald Reagan's administration.
Alan Keyes, who most recently sought the Republican nomination in 2008, discussed concerns about why Obama has a number reserved for Connecticut applicants, despite the president's never having lived in the Constitution State.
The first three digits of Obama's SSN are 042. That code falls within the range of numbers for Connecticut, which according to the Social Security Administration has been 040 through 049.
"I believe that when you are confronted with a situation that is filled with these kinds of what shall we call them anomalies, disparities, it is reasonable common sense to want to try to get straight answers," said Keyes.
"If you're trying to ascertain whether or not somebody ought to be sitting with, as they used to say, their finger on the button of nuclear weapons that can blow up the world, their power extending to decisions that can collapse our economy, their influence extending to areas that can destroy the standards and moral conscience of our people in the eyes of the world, I think you might want to know who they were. It might be a good idea!"
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I hope not. It should have been an issue long ago though.
No, it’s not going to be an issue unless Taitz gets her way in court. If she is rebuffed it’s a nonissue.
All of you crazy, gun-loving, bible-thumping,
knuckle-dragging morons are picking at straws again.
You’re trying to bring down the most brilliant, intelligent, all-knowing president that has ever occupied the Oval Office.
/SARCASM/
If I remember correctly, his mother was working with dying old folks in the New England area in the 1970’s. She got the number from a deceased old lady born in 1890.
I guess that’s called “recycling”.
Mebbie the ‘wrong’ information was used when Barry got his FIRST (of many) SS numbers.
There’s a boatload of mysteries surrounding this guy and not one thing will be brought up. It wasn’t brought up during the last campaign, so what makes WND think anyone is going to have the huevos to do it now? Congress laughs at it. The Supremes are evading it. The msm falls over themselves to cover it up.
This may mean that 0 once had a job in Connecticut. It could have been a summer job.
What we need is the original application, showing when the number was issued.
The whole question of 0s identity is very intriguing. I think that we need a DNA test, first of all, to attempt to confirm his paternity. It is likely that his mother herself did not know for sure the identity of 0s genetic father. Pres. 0 looks very much like his mother and her family (as one would expect), but he looks remarkably unlike the Kenyan Obama fellow, who may have been a convenient stand-in when his mother found herself pregnant.
The Obama campaign would love nothing better than for his opponents to be worried about his Birth Certificate and his SS #.
Let's say you are the owner of a business and you find out that a guy you hired six years ago, and have now promoted to your highest position, is a psychotic axe-murderer. Would you just shrug it off and say, "I'll let it go, it should have been an issue long ago, too late now" ?????
Or would you use that knowledge in your arsenal of things you do to get rid of the guy you know is out to kill you?
Those were also the SSNs that were targeted by ID thieves because they knew there would be little activity on the SSN and it would also be a matter of time before the person would die (being elderly and all).
I also remember hearing that Obama had never lived in Conn and his first job was in Hawaii as a teenager. Therefore his SSN would have shown HI numbers.
Of course not. And I didn't. I posted hundreds of comments and some articles on the issue during Trump.
After seeing that Congress could have cared less about Constitutional Eligibility, I finally got off the issue.
I just don't think it should be an election issue. It's an issue that should have been resolved before the first election and again before this election.
Should we go back to this issue after the election?
Hell yeah. Whether he wins or not. It will be revisited.
And it's still being looked into as we speak. I just don't think it would benefit us to make it an election issue. And I spent weeks thinking about it.
It's a constitutional issue.
One can bet his bottom dollar that anyone who brings up the subject of social security numbers will be vehemently dismissed as a crazy, bible-thumping, gun-loving,
knuckle-dragging, right-wing terrorist.
IMHO
In election, sidebar issues like this sometimes are as important as the ‘main issues’. The idea is to slowly peel people’s confidence on him by showing the possibility that he faked his own ID, or obtained it illegally. It should never be the main issue in which the opponent run on. In fact, the opponent should never bring up such issue. Let other people do it.
Gee, I thought his SS# began with 6 6 6
“Let’s say you are the owner of a business and you find out that a guy you hired six years ago, and have now promoted to your highest position, is a psychotic axe-murderer. Would you just shrug it off and say, “I’ll let it go, it should have been an issue long ago, too late now” ?????
Or would you use that knowledge in your arsenal of things you do to get rid of the guy you know is out to kill you?”
Exactly right. Too many moles here tell us so what if Hussein’s not a natural born citizen, it’s just a technicality.
What a POS fraud he is and the even worse who elected him.
This may mean that 0 once had a job in Connecticut. It could have been a summer job.
///
when the CT SSN was issued, Obama was a teenager in Hawaii.
under the law then, he would have had to apply in person in CT. which he never did.
=
“
I think we should stick to the main issuethe fact that he is a really crappy President.”
///
yes, we are incapable of doing both.
so we should ignore clear evidence of criminal fraud, and multiple felonies. because showing that, wouldn’t help us defeat Obama...
Excellent... This is how we should be responding to the “No, let’s not go there” crowd. Wasn’t that the mainstay of Ace McCain’s “campaign”? His 2008 “concession” speech makes me want to puke.
The new Republican president will make two Supreme Court appointments immediately thereafter, and a host of judicial appointments that will help move the country back to the original intent of the founders.
The Democrat party will be effectively destroyed as the investigations and probes drill downward and ferret out all the co-conspirators.
Evidently they were important to Obama when he was running for lower offices. IIRC he "won" his first office by getting signatures disqualified from his opponent's nominating petition. He won the Senate contest in large measure by getting a crooked court to unseal the previously-sealed divorce records of his opponent. Obama is nothing if not a master of the dirty Chicago-style politics. Of all the players in this tawdry tragicomedy of a presidency, Obama is the one most deserving of payback of a kind close to what he has dished out to others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.