Posted on 08/05/2011 3:16:16 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
I rarely post an article, even more rare that I post a vanity. I feel that this is a topic that involves everybody, both pro and against. I have a few thoughts of my own, but I would also like to hear from heads and tails. Law enforcement, if they wish, please add your viewpoints; I am certain that you have a unique perspective. I'm hoping that this doesn't turn into a flame war.
I will submit from the start that I do not use drugs. So if anybody wants to issue a blanket statement that states 'If you don't use them, why be afraid if you have nothing to hide.' I regard that statement as analogous to 'if you have nothing to hide, why not submit to your house being search at will." Both statements are totalitaian canards by nature. They are disingenuous at best. Horrific at the worst.
There is something I want to address, a peculiar, non-traditional method that our government imposes, a dictum that seems to be the only solution for any problem that may arise.
Take the Second Amendment for example. Gun control (I often call it 'citizen control'). It appears that our government always addresses the lowest denominator possible. What I mean by this is that we have a relatively small group of people responsible for gun violence. In this scenario, the government responds by abrogating the rights of the many, law abiding citizens who are not guilty of these acts. Another example is the policing of what we eat. Same methodology. Restrictions are imposed on restaurants because a small group of people do not meet the physical 'requirements' that our politicians believe to be ideal.
This creeping type of political ideology is becoming more bold with every passing day. It is an invasion on all levels ranging from repealing 'don't ask, don't tell', to the blatant edicts emanating from Homeland Security. Which brings me to the crux of the matter. What and when is enough?
I will plainly state that I have had enough. How can any person state that we are fighting a War on Drugs and War on Terror with a straight face? We can simply declare that we have no borders and that could be stated with a straight face.
If you cannot (rather will not) find wave upon wave of illegal immigrants, how can you possibly expect to win both wars?
The reason is that such policies are intended for political expediency, and nothing more. Both parties are falling all over themselves to court the potential voting block. So what are they doing?
They are fighting a War on Civilians. Creating more and more alphabet soup agencies that it is mind numbing. This done out of 'sensitivities' so as not to offend Islam, illegal aliens, and other pet liberal groups.
The only people on the losing side in The War on Drugs are the average citizens who favor our disappearing Constitutional Republic. Our rights are being systematically destroyed, the Constitution is being fed into the paper shredder and it will not stop. Again, the question "what and when does it stop?". I for one have had enough. How do you feel?
An employer has the right to hire whomever they wish to. If you are driving a truck for example, the employer assumes the risk and should be concerned about a loaded driver. I had to think about the horse statement. Never have.
It is the government's tendency to exploit social issues that concerns me the most. That is the problem.
I will tell you right now, I am not for legalizing street drugs. This hue and cry is being raised by those already addicted who could care less if our children who have no clue about addiction have the legal ability to buy mind-altering drugs.
Just like alcohol. In the history of our country the mind-altering affects of alcohol caused the many to bang bang shoot ‘em up, and after prohibition failed because the many were already addicted to it, it was once again legalized. And today we have 37% of the deaths in the US thanks to idiots getting in their cars drunker than Cooter Brown. Not only drunk, but also high on wacky weed at the same time.
If you want to get rid of the US DEA, I’m certainly for that. We already have enough fire power on the streets in every city, county and state to uphold the drug laws locally where they are accountable to local citizens.
We already have US customs officials on our borders and shipping yards. Why aren’t they doing their jobs? Perhaps if they were made accountable to local citizens they might do a better job.
As for the Border Patrol, it should be disbanded and our borders protected by US soldiers stationed every 100 miles whose responsibility is to patrol their section to prevent the smuggling of humans and drugs.
Snip - U.S. federal agents allegedly allowed the Sinaloa drug cartel to traffic several tons of cocaine into the United States in exchange for information about rival cartels, according to court documents filed in a U.S. federal court. -Snip
Worse than the Gunrunner scandal, the feds have allowed TONS of cocaine into the country (Chicago Area!!!) in exchange for information on rival cartels. This corruption extends to the highest level of our government.
Violent criminals are those that should be put away. So I'm not soft on crime if that is what you are trying to imply. Some of the sentences I see for the crimes of that nature is a joke.
Much like the famous "now madam we are just haggling about the price" hypothetical about prostitution, with legal alcohol, we are merely haggling about who gets the money.
Border Patrol agents who are handcuffed by the government, and at times have been prosecuted for doing their job.
As for the Border Patrol, it should be disbanded and our borders protected by US soldiers stationed every 100 miles whose responsibility is to patrol their section to prevent the smuggling of humans and drugs.
Don't forget about the wall. (no sarcasm). The problem is that so many illegals are here that politicians only think about getting potentional votes. We get screwed in the process. As always.
Where in the Ten Commandments does it mention drug abuse?
In the wake of Ramos and Compean, punished by my good friend Johnny Sutton for interfering with Aldrete Davila and the Mexican government, we have Border Patrol Agent JESUS DIAZ.Welcome to the FreeAgentDiaz.com webpage hosted by the Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council.
LEOAC is the sole entity legally authorized by Jesus and Diana Diaz to represent them. We are the best source of information when it comes to bad government persecutions by way of prosecutions in what we call the "War on Law Enforcement". The Diaz case has continued a pattern that goes back as far as the Clinton Administration.
~ The rule is:
Do not interfere with the drug trade. Former U.S. Customs Officer JOHN CARMAN was framed and held in Federal prison from Fall 2007 until May 2011. He was a whistleblower on Customs corruption regarding the drug trade:
2007 Letter to House Judiciary re John Carman
The following letter to the House Judiciary Committee was written by an attorney that witnessed the criminal trail by Department of Justice personnel against former U.S. Customs agent John Carman, who had been exposing corruption in upper management through his Internet site, www.customscorruption.com.
~ I sent a fax of this to Senate Judiciary, namely Grassley, after speaking with his staff person at the committee on the eve of its next F & F hearing.
The original was sent to Grassley and others in 2007, apparently without effect.
The border is open for business. Afghanistan's poppy crop is apparently on the rebound.
The Karzai brother accused of being a CIA tool and a druglord was assassinated.
ATF arms the drug cartels while DEA busts the little meth lab here, the little pot op there.
USG is a Chamber of Commerce for large dealers.
There is just. So much. Money.
A new team in DC could do the Hercules Augean Stables Servicemaster cleaning that town needs.
Toward a drug- and thug-free America.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2759201/posts
lol.
You mentioned a child abuser getting out four or five times and killing the child. I got it confused with that story. heh
If the government refuses to defend our borders, while at the same time stating that it is fighting a War On Drugs, how can it do so? It doesn't add up. The only people feeling the heat is the citizens of this country being forced to endure our liberties taken and also to put up with the violent crime associated with these illegals. I doubt that our liberal leaders reside in such neighborhoods. It's not their problem. They don't care.
I don’t post often. I’m not here to win some popularity contest. So say whatever you want to. I don’t care.
I knew that I would catch flak on this articles when I posted it. People will slap a label on me for it, “he’s one of them” and I don’t care at all. If they want to flush the Constitution down the toilet, go ahead. They won’t be taking me with them if I can help it. We are a police state, I would suggest a fledgling totalitarian state. A government that essentially has stated through Homeland Security that all conservatives are a terrorist threat. There is nothing funny about that.
I don't believe that this is an anomaly.
Rape and murder aren’t commodities, drugs are. Drugs involve money. get control of the money, you get control of the problem.
“the Sinaloa drug cartel”
Dang! They allowed the shit to sinaloa!
Wow for a brief second I thought you were channeling MO!
I have a friend whose daughter is giving her a really hard time. This kid stood up in the school cafeteria and announced that she was going home to smoke pot, and that she had a plant.
Within a short time, the police went to my friends house and upended EVERYTHING in her place. That may have been to the tipping point for me. My friend is straight as an arrow. She was crying and shaking. Coming apart.
Keep in mind that somebody could do the same to you if they don't like you. It's a witch hunt.
Customs agents are a whole new agency different from BPA’s. They’re stationed at every port of entry. Way far away from their DC bureaucrats. They need to be made accuntable to local jurisdictions.
There’s not a fence high enough that the rats can chew through, ladder over or dig under. Only armed manpower is going to stop it. Get rid of the BPA’s, the many who have family across the border and replace them with soldiers subject to the USMJS.
If someone announces to the world that they are going to go home and comit a crime what do you want the cops to do, ignore it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.