I can understand that some of them might not have been willing to go for capital murde, but I don't understand how they gave her a pass on the lesser count. Actually, what I REALLY don't understand is that out fo the 12, there wasn't ONE joror who felt that she was guilt of manslaughter, and wasn't willing to stick to his/her guns..hold the other juror's feet to the fire, and if necesary, HANG the entire jury..deadlock it.
THat's what I can't comprehend...and never will.
Ken, one did...a young gal who is a college student at St. Pete U. There was a thread on it last night—she told ABC News that they cried and were sick to their stomachs after their decision.
“there wasn’t ONE joror who felt that she was guilt of manslaughter, and wasn’t willing to stick to his/her guns..hold the other juror’s feet to the fire, and if necesary, HANG the entire jury..deadlock it.”
That person would be a hero today!
One of them was on tv early this am. Not the alternate guy - was a female and she was dumb as a box of rocks.
I was half asleep and tried to look at tv and see what number juror she was but the trailer didn’t say.
Apparently she never even considered any of the other options, she just said she couldn’t give the death penalty when the state did not prove it’s case - the interviewer should have come back and said that there were other options, not only the death penalty.
Contrary to what I've always understood, I was told that If it was a 12 person jury, they only needed 9 jurors for a verdict. Truthie??
http://jezebel.com/5818820/first-casey-anthony-juror-speaks—i-did-not-say-she-was-innocent
I haven’t looked at this - don’t think it’s the interview I saw. “I didn’t say she was innocent” blech!