[untwist]

I think you have a hard time convincing the Tea Party that she is not formidable or gutsy or a leader. She was there with them from the start and was very influential in driving the agenda and is a very strong fundraiser. By the way, tax and spending cuts are what we need to turn the economy around and her positions are all about that.

I say again, her chances of being the vice president grow by the day.

[ansel12]

We both agree she has good positions (so do you and I), but she is 55 and has never shown the ability, talent, or drive, to lead or cause change, or be effective, her decade in government was just passive voting, and taking a back seat to more competent people and leaders.

[Gargantua]

I am a founding member of the Tea Party in my area of New England, and I can tell you that our entire group is just waiting, patiently, for Sarah to decide when the time is right.

We are generally intelligent and informed, and we know the myriad excellent reasons why Sarah is putting off announcing for as long as possible. Thus, we are not concerned, rather we applaud her exceptional campaign so far, and are happy to wait and watch as she continues to control the entire 2012 cycle with her elegant pinkie finger.

You?

;^\/

[editor-surveyor]

>> “By the way, tax and spending cuts are what we need to turn the economy around and her positions are all about that.” <<

.
Then why did she back away from pushing spending cuts when Cantor told her to?