Number 5 on your list would be:
5. The publication, AAPG, The American Association for Petroleum Geologists, is a VERY reputable ACTUALLY peer reviewed professional magazine for the geology and geophysics areas of research and industry.
(I think, at least in time, he WILL be listened to! Every serious geology student subscribes to this magazine...many of them want to find OIL, and must have REAL DATA...so they won’t care about someone’s academic sacred cow!)
Number 5 on your list would be:
5. The publication, AAPG, The American Association for Petroleum Geologists, is a VERY reputable ACTUALLY peer reviewed professional magazine for the geology and geophysics areas of research and industry.
(I think, at least in time, he WILL be listened to! Every serious geology student subscribes to this magazine...many of them want to find OIL, and must have REAL DATA...so they won’t care about someone’s academic sacred cow!)
Likely so.
Thx.
Though, UNsurprisingly, the hostile naysayers on FR are still silent on his scholarly and extensive experience based assertions.
Nor am I expecting an apology or retraction.
After all . . . the 12th Commandment seems to be . . . once the resident kook, always the resident kook.
Would you agree, geologist?
Number 5 on your list would be:
5. The publication, AAPG, The American Association for Petroleum Geologists, is a VERY reputable ACTUALLY peer reviewed professional magazine for the geology and geophysics areas of research and industry.
(I think, at least in time, he WILL be listened to! Every serious geology student subscribes to this magazine...many of them want to find OIL, and must have REAL DATA...so they won’t care about someone’s academic sacred cow!)