First we had puppy mills - but at least the AKC registered the litters!!!!!
I always found this both disgusting and terrifying. Does not the Bible admonish men to "not spill their seed"?
Wisdom - lost for the ages.
1 posted on
06/20/2011 2:46:38 AM PDT by
sodpoodle
To: sodpoodle
I think the real issue in that story was the treatment of the wife and the husbands refusal to let her have a child, not the spilling of seed per se.
This would fall under sex outside of wedlock and bringing life into the world without providing the fathering that was meant to be.
2 posted on
06/20/2011 2:56:34 AM PDT by
DannyTN
To: sodpoodle
At $50/pop, child support forever.
3 posted on
06/20/2011 3:02:42 AM PDT by
Jonty30
To: sodpoodle
What a sick and immoral business.
4 posted on
06/20/2011 3:02:59 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: sodpoodle
5 posted on
06/20/2011 3:06:14 AM PDT by
Impy
(Don't call me red.)
To: sodpoodle
Does not the Bible admonish men to "not spill their seed"?Don' take it out of context. A man didn't impregnate his wife. The child would be a forefather in the line of David and thus of Christ. If no child was born to this woman then that line never would have been.
Lays it out well...TAMAR, FOREMOTHER OF DAVID
7 posted on
06/20/2011 3:13:09 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: sodpoodle
Got to remember that also in the same book of Genesis, Abraham, seeing that his wife Sarah did not have a child, Sarah directed Abraham to father a child via Hagar, the maid-servant.
9 posted on
06/20/2011 3:26:54 AM PDT by
Biggirl
("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
To: sodpoodle
At least in the ‘hood the guys do it the old fashioned way.
I’ve said for 40+ years sperm donation is a mistake.
Their must be enough sperm on ice to repopulation the world.
At some point the sexual act will be omitted from procreation. :(
10 posted on
06/20/2011 3:27:03 AM PDT by
Vinnie
To: sodpoodle
One bad apple could explain the rise in liberalism.
14 posted on
06/20/2011 3:58:30 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: sodpoodle
One bad apple could explain the rise in liberalism.
15 posted on
06/20/2011 3:58:39 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: sodpoodle
One bad apple could explain the rise in liberalism.
16 posted on
06/20/2011 3:58:39 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: sodpoodle
Whitehurst could be the father of 42 to 60 children
And in all likelihood those children all live in the same geographic area. I wonder what the odds are of two of them meeting and, not knowing that they're half-siblings, ending up in a relationship that results in marriage?
To: sodpoodle
This isnt my cup of tea.
However my first thought was isnt it nice that high end sperm donors are spreading it around instead of the usual low end low lifes.
21 posted on
06/20/2011 4:22:45 AM PDT by
Chickensoup
(The right to bear arms is proved to prevent government genocide. Protect yourself!)
To: sodpoodle
Pity the poor, lost, fatherless children.
It’s a sad, sad story for them.
22 posted on
06/20/2011 4:26:06 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(Castigo Cay is in print and on Kindle.)
To: sodpoodle
Wow. And I sold blood when I was in college.
31 posted on
06/20/2011 5:57:42 AM PDT by
Kenton
(Trust, but carry a gun...)
To: sodpoodle
The perils of turning pro and a testament to keeping your amateur status.
33 posted on
06/20/2011 6:15:43 AM PDT by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
To: sodpoodle
People, please realize, especially after Father's Day yesterday, that a father is a man who raises a child. He fathers! Borrowing genetics from a 3rd party does Not Make that 3rd party a parent. If a couple can't have the child they long for more than anything in the world, they can fight infertility by adoption or gamete donation. Neither is a moral failing. These options are ways to love and raise children. Genetics do not matter in love or childrearing.
Other than foster-to-adopt, adoption costs a lot of money and it's hard to get an infant (thus without serious emotional problems that may be lifelong). Using donor sperm if the father is infertile, or eggs if the mother is, would cost less, and would mean you could control the important prenatal care and early attachment and love of the baby.
The media and unthinking people love to CROW about how wrong these solutions are, how untasteful and immoral. They are wrong. The donor only provided some genetics. The donor is not a "dad" and never will be. He is only the source of some genetic traits. In the end, the genetic traits are just cocktail party conversation. What a parent Does with his child is parenting.
41 posted on
06/20/2011 9:41:44 AM PDT by
Yaelle
To: sodpoodle
not spilled, bottled for later use.
the children are the product.
if anything this is the wet dream of feminists, fatherless offspring.
46 posted on
06/21/2011 4:20:32 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson