Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hope_dies_last

You also fail to consider those down stream. By absorbing the water in Missouri, the flow rate is dramatically slowed. The volume of water arriving in Memphis and New Orleans will be the same. The rate at which it arrives and the flood levels will both be diminished.

The decision is much broader than some farms in Missouri or a ghost town in Illinois.

The farmers bought land in the flood plain and should expect floods. The levees do not eliminate the risk.


7 posted on 05/04/2011 3:01:15 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: bert

The blasts did nothing to ease risks downstream, where the Army Corps of Engineers warns that the Mississippi River could rise to its highest levels since the 1920s.

http://www.usatoday.com/weather/floods/2011-05-03-mississippi-river-cairo-illinois-levee-floods_n.htm


9 posted on 05/04/2011 3:05:46 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson