Posted on 04/30/2011 1:44:17 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
... that is, just enough to pay the interest payment? He says that it must be raised to avoid defaulting, so surely this is all he wants, right? If he were to say that more is needed, then he really is fearmongering for more massive borrow-and-spend. Boehner could agree to voting for just enough of a raise in exchange for a balanced budget amendment vote. If Dems don't good along they put then country at risk of defaulting
Surely this is all Geithner wants... /s.
If the ceiling is raised, they will take that as free reign to spend spend spend spend spend.
>Would Geithner Be Content With A Debt Ceiling Raise Just Enough To Avoid Defaulting...
No, because they will still spend money that they don’t have and then we’ll have another “Debt Ceiling Raise Just Enough To Avoid Defaulting” ad infinitum.
But what if its raised by only around $200 billion, enough tomake the interest payment?
They will see it as approval to spend 400 billion.
Remember, it was the Dems and Nancy Pelosi who said that you had to increase spending to pay for a tax cut back when Bubba Gump was in office.
They also currently claim you can spend your way to prosperity.
The politicians in both parties do not want to cut spending -- that is why they will raise the debt ceiling: they INTEND to take us further into debt.
But Obama says that we must learn to live within our means. Surely then GOP would hold him tour his words.
That is what I am getting at...
He says that it must be raised to avoid defaulting, so surely this is all he wants, right? If he were to say that more is needed, then he really is fearmongering for more massive borrow-and-spend.
The government collects $150 billion in taxes a month after interest payments.
The government spends $260 billion in taxes a month.
Cut $110 billion. EPA, DOE, HUD, the three initial departments that can disappear are endless.
Current revenues are sufficient to pay the interest on the debt without default. If this were not so, we would already be in default. Current revenues are not sufficient to pay the interest payments AND pay for all the other programs/obligations already on the Federal plate. This is why we have a yearly deficit. Without a debt ceiling increase, program cuts across the board will be forced, which Congress is obviously loathe to do themselves. I believe that is EXACTLY what should happen.
The only reason they want to raise the debt ceiling is to BORROW/SPEND MORE MONEY.
It is as simple as that!
Tim, it’s Visa on the phone again for you...
ML/NJ
Shouldn’t Republicans be lowering the debt ceiling?
Why is the argument about (how much) to raise it?
Lower it. Then keep lowering it.
But what if its raised by only around $200 billion, enough tomake the interest payment?
**************************************************
Why? Let the gov’t spend the $400B in unspent TARP funds .. that should give them enough time to layoff/fire 20% of the fedgov workforce...
Simple, balance this year’s budget...no debt ceiling increase needed!
As others have said, potential default has nothing to do with the debt ceiling...current tax revenues are vastly more than enough to cover current interest payments.
Maybe I am Stupid, but it seems to me that if you REFUSE TO BORROW ANY MORE MONEY, ie. not raise the debt ceiling, That is, By Default, a BALANCED BUDGET. So why in the hell do we need some silly “Balanced Budget Amendment”???????
“Cut $110 billion. EPA, DOE, HUD, the three initial departments that can disappear are endless.”
A good start and don’t forget to add the Dept of Education to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.