I don't know what I don't know, but I do know enough that most of these stories are full of hyperbole, people automatically default towards a position based on their contrived ideas. You only see some of the facts (much more is usually presented when there is a trial) and video is but part of it. More often than not, you are proven wrong in the long run may that be Rodney King, the Duke Lacrosse team, the Philadelphia police beating someone.........
No, if he lives there does matter.
Yes, someones past does indicate ones credibility or if one is a consistent/persistent shit head looking for trouble, trying to squeeze out a dime or make his 15 minutes of fame by pulling some stunt.
Yes, you are a liar because you omit information from articles you probably quoted. Omission of pertinent information to intentionally mislead or deceive is a form of lying. Sorry that makes you “feel” bad about yourself, I know in our society it's all about making people “feel” good about themselves.
No, I didn't omit you intentionally, I just don't care because discussing things with someone that has no intent of seeking the truth is a waste of time, and I don't know how to send a post to multiple people at once.
No, I'm not a coward, I earned my CIB on three occasions, I have two combat tours as an infantryman, one which was 17 months in Iraq which made be a 90% disabled VET.
This is my last post to you, as I stated, I don't waste my time with people who have no intent on being truthful and simply want to twist something so it fits their contrived idea of how they want to see things. You might as well be one of those that jump on the Jesse Jackson bandwagon.
Do this- wait and see how it turns out, then ask yourself why it didn't turn out the way you thought (as is most often the case)? Obviously this will then be a conspiracy..... lol
I quit reading at “articles you probably quoted”.
Your assumptions are what they are. You are calling me a liar based on things “you probably quoted”.
Mindless, silly, vapid. Good day.